Monday, January 25, 2010

ROLE OF PRP IN AP POLITICS

PRP took socialist telangana stand in elections. it never said it is in favor of separate telangana. but what ever word comes from any party on t issue is/was only in diplomatic language, trs did not follow diplomatic words.trs always followed direct words and propagated stands of other parties also in direct words irrespective of parties stand on t issue.as people understand direct words, people votes. all parties congress,tdp,prp,lok satta never condemned trs propagation of their stands in direct words.
PRP took U turn after dec.9.to protect united AP. its welcome move from political point of view and from united ap point of view and also from PRP party point of view. PRP won only 2 MLA seats in t region, 2 corporator seats in GHMC elections. so it has no base in t region including hyd, but it has strong base in seemandhra where it got 18 MLA seats and influenced poll out come in many constituencies. seemandhra people are openly in favour of united ap. so from party point PRP took right stand in right time.even it supports t issue it will not be having space in t politics even if t forms due to presence of large number of parties- congress,tdp,bjp,trs,mim,lok satta,cpi,cpm...but assembly seats are only 119 including hyd, if hyd is not included in t region then only 99 will remain in t state.no party will get majority, every time coalition govt will stay in power, even after seat sharing single party may get 10-15 seats, out of them how many it wins is a million dollar question. so prp wisely left t region.if it sticks to t stand then it will certainly lose ground in seemandhra.
prp remains the sole champion of united ap party now from open party stand, when a small party like trs was able to create present situation by political steps then why not prp from united ap side. it will definitely influence politics from state to central level. it already started acting with diplomacy first and chiranjeevi meeting upa allies...even he has no MPs he will influence politics in centre. trs has only 2 MPs. having MPs or not is not the matter here, t issue will not be solved over night. it will take years. even if congress, tdp decides to give t state then prp will check their future in seemandhra thus it will force congress,tdp work more towards united ap. if elections comes due to this cause then ultimately every party in state, national level must follow united ap stand in clear cut terms other wise they lose votes in seemandhra and united ap voters in hyd,t region.its big.only trs ,cpi,bjp will remain with t voice but their influence is low and winning chances are also low.thus if elections comes united ap voice will win, other wise prp will force cong,tdp to work for united ap in back door and ensure no division of state. if no one voices politically for united ap then thinking of cong,tdp will be different as their seemandhra leaders are voicing for united ap. but they are with in party, prp is party and goes to people seeking their mandate and will expose all activities of tdp,cong.so powerful political check emerged to trs from united ap view point. cong,tdp has to decide whether to follow trs,or prp stands in elections as both is championing single cause.cong,tdp must find solution by not giving scope to prp,trs to win in elections,obviously it will be late process and favourable to united ap.as majority voice, capitalists voice, national interest,unity voice...will only win.
cong,tdp was able to support trs stand in indirect words because no party supported united ap in clear words and has the ability to divide votes,except cpm party. but cpm is a small party and can not influence out come of elections on the whole.now prp took clear stand towards united ap, and that too in needed time and has the capacity to not only divide votes but win large chunk of seats. in telangana trs has the capacity only to divide votes in limited constituencies, it did not had the capability even to contest all seats in t region. so politics will swing towards united ap by 2014 elections. as dividion will benefit trs,bjp in t region and prp in seemandhra irrespective of what ever say cong,tdp on division ultimately only these parties will benefit more if division happens. in seemandhra prp certainly wins majority seats. in t region trs will get capacity to contest all seats with confidence, enough cong,tdp will sit in home as bjp has strength in t region, muslims will float t region wide party as they have influencing vote share and fear of bjp,trs, so fight becomes between bjp-mim,cong-trs and a mix of them, tdp will wind up.bjp,trs are first in provocations, muslims are worst affected. to day provocations are going on towards seemandhra people, tomorrow it will be between t people-muslims as muslims are past rulers and has considerable vote share in t region so provocations will start.in any angle cong will loss in seemandhra and reduces to third party status in t region.so MP seats in centre will be in single digit from present ap for congress.
its the leadership, diplomacy of prp leader that can influence any what i said in fore words, but prp never utilised opportunity so far, it gave grand entry in to ap politics but failed with in months, now also it is not doing anything to influence any one, it just gave open support to united ap and sitting back looking for some one who could do anything so that it can follow them.

No comments:

Post a Comment