NAXALS- DORAS- TELANGANA AGITATION

T demanding leaders are continuously saying that naxals are not present in the T agitation and naxals can not be in the agitation as long as so called doras are there in the agitation, so what ever united AP leaders are saying about presence of naxals in the T agitation is wrong.

facts here are naxals are agressive, playing main role in the movement fron nov.29 itself as per police sayings and facts on ground from OU and other places, so called doras joined T agitation after dec.9 to grab the golden opportunity given by sonia with foolish dec.9 decision, but naxals are still continuing in this agitation, naxals openly extended their support to T agitation, issued threat to life to political leaders to resign for T state demand and participate in movement, declared bandh calls etc....many naxals are being arrested, encountered, OU fate is known well.

why both - doras, naxals are participating in this?

with out participation of both T state formation is not possible, strong participation of both is also not enough to form T state in reality, but dec.9 statement gave golden opportunity to doras to carve out state for them, every one knows that it was not KCR or TRS that made problem complex but vertical split of congress party that made T issue complex.

naxals need T state formation for their designs in india as a whole. because to weaken present AP state , which is powerful opponent to them in india as a state itself with strong money, muscle power. social strcture in T region support naxal movement after T formation because of concentration of power in hands of so called doras from top to bottom level, fly away of industries,jobs etc...increase unemployment on one hand on other hand doras who promised jobs during t agitation can not provide them to students, cases are there already...this creates fertile base ground for maoist upsurge on one hand, strength of maoists in central india increases.so that maoists will be undefeated in central india from T region to bihar.T state can not defeat maoists because so called doras took maoists help directly ormindirectly for T formation, so passive approach has to be followed atleast to some time to prevent people opposition to the leaders, money of state will be limited, manpower will be limited, structures take time to set up and strengten themselves even money provided, the state govt has to depend on centre for everything. failure of so called doras in govt, welfare, development,employment...on one hand existing opposition to doras in social strcture on other hand will provide heaven to naxal movement.

doras might have felt they can use naxals now as they are themselves participating in movement, lets have passive approach towards them now as they are providing support to the so called agitation, once T forms then we can crush them in the name of law and order.but they can not do it in reality.

sonia's woes

how to win people in entire AP- Seemandhra, GHMC,Telangana while solving Tissue permanently?

how to defeat TDP in AP state in- Seemandhra, GHMC, Telangana while solving T issue permanently?

how to prevent BJP in centre, state from using T issue in politics/elections while solving T issue?

division with in congress, TDP playing perfect counter game,.....makes unique solution to T problem favouring division is.......?

committee is only a time buying one to find solution politically with eliminations, switch overs....

TRS EPISODE

KCR started TRS in 2001 to find place in AP politics, won from his constituency with his own personal image and socio economic conditions in those days. but in 2004 YSR tied up with TRS to prevent splitting of votes in T region, because TDP is expected to win elections comfortably even after his padayatra. TRS neither can win nor can form govt but splits votes thus helping TDP to defeat congress. so YSR allies with TRS, but later he realised that TRS is nonsense and the main contest was between TDP and congress only and he mistakenly gave birth to TRS instead of eliminating it, but TRS was required in centre due to 5 MP seats it was having so T issue was mentioned in President's address. in state YSR buried TRS politically by splitting it on one hand, un popularising it on other hand in people.but in 2009 elections BABU helped TRS to stay in politics due to PRP,LOK SATTA emegence resulting in tough competition. congress, tdp allied with TRS by giving diplomatic, un realistic words oriented support o T issue, but TRS as lies telling party propagated them in direct words, congress group politics helped TRS lot in this game.

TRS now is on edge of permanent burial. it underestimated Babu and seemandhra leaders-congress/tdp/prp-.its fake fast drama gave bounty result to it instead of mere political survival, this itself is a sign of back track on dec.9 statement.

TRS buried itself due to resignations on one hand, committee formation on other hand. KCR's meeting, silence after jan.5 meeting up to 10 days shows he lost everything.he attempted to bounce back but defeated again in political game, now its strategies itself are receiving obstacles with babu starting attacks on agitators.

COMMITTEE - ANALYSIS

Congress high command- sonia- took Dec.9 decision to form T state from AP. it showed Dec.7 meeting of AP parties with CM, deteriorating KCR health and students involvement in agitation and chalo Assembly program from them as reasons for Dec. 9 decision. all the reasons showed by Sonia are open lies and every common man knew that there is no truth in these resons. AP people dont want division but sonia decided to divide it against their wish, interests as a result movement erupted all over AP by dec.10 morning. but T leaders and their cadre who took surprise along with fellow people, leaders in all regions on dec.9 statement of chidambaram decided strongly to not let this gifted golden opportunity go out of their hands, thus suppressed united AP agitation/voices in T region, media was controlled well and counter attacks took place on those who dared to voice for united AP. but in seemandhra movement ran with strong force from day to day as things worsened dec.23 statement came from sonia, it put T leaders in unhappy mode as they felt they got T state with out any effort, reason but it is going now , so they felt to put their best to create movement so that dec.23 statement can be reversed, but sonia can not reverse dec.23 statement as she realised truth if division happens against people wish and division is not peoples wish so she called for discussions on jan.5.2010 as starting process of discussions seriously but she can not decide either division or unity on that date as she created boiling environment in state with dec.9,23 statements so double standard approach was taken there, then committee was formed to continue discussions, find truth, scientific reasons..etc..as reasons on paper. the true agenda is to prepare people for any- division or unity- on one hand and political switch over on other hand.

she has to defeat TDP,PRP in state from getting advantage in elections either in united AP or in divided parts- both-, BJP in center to prevent it from using T issue in politics and decide on fate of AP in future if BJP comes to power. its complex story. here all separatists got strength with dec.9 statement in both parts as profits to these division protagonists are bounty if division happens but people will lose.

committee task is to find reasons to support sonia decision- division, united AP- thus gave it an authentication from common man point of view, legal sanctity from law point of view...and time for doing all political actions to prepare people for any decision and appeasing, convincing or winning politicians as per her decision.

facts shows that division is her agenda.she made weak division demand strong, strengthened division protogonists in both sides and then gave dec.9 statement, but dec.10 sudden eruption of united AP movement with un expected people support put her in defence, rethinking, but she is committed to division so that she searched for safe route to execute her division plan through committee route so that all political , vote problems can be solved. united AP leaders in telangana unable to come open in support of united AP even after committee formation, Botsa avocating division to divide united AP voice, Rosaiah continuing still on CM chair...proves that she stands for division only. but fact is Botsa failed, T leaders who are for united AP will put their views before committee, people supporting united AP in telangana will put their views before committee even she felt she charged atmosphere in T region for division but once peace comes, debate takes place, facts comes out then people favour united AP only. politically also congress will be no more in present AP if division happens irrespective of sonia plans to save party or its cadre in one way or other as many got strength now and independent now and lost trust on congress.

if committee is genuine then its recommendation will be for united AP only. the what sonia will do.

its complex foolish self suicide game started by sonia with powerful Babu as her opponent.lets see what she do

truth - division politics

reasons for present regional disparities in india, states, districts are

1. poor economy of india in 1947 when it got independence.

2. division of india in to india,pakistan thus forcing loss of fertile lands to pakistan one hand resulting in loss of food security, industries based on those areas, transport etc... on one hand , on other hand influx of huge number of refugees in to india from pakistan.

3. wars with pakistan, china resulting in loss of life, huge money...and forceful expenditure in substantial amount on defence, defence preparedness even to day.

4. rapid population growth making minimum needs of people a big question mark.

5. low level of technology, scientific experiments, poor education, minimum number of educated people etc...

this made government to focus on minimum needs satisfying and securing self sufficiency with minimum available minimum amount, technology so ultimately areas are prefered where development is possible with minimum expenditure and results will be immediate. thus growth is localised to certain areas and other areas are attached to it in interdependent, complementary way...now after 1990s when liberlisation, privatisation, globalisation started govt is getting money substantially with fruits of efforts from 1947 in planned manner started giving results, spread of development to other areas started. here politics started. those areas where development occurred politicians are reluctant to share benefits of that development to others, those areas where development is spreading politicians want their control over all developmental activities, mines , resources etc...so that only they could benefit from developmental activities on one hand and get control over resources so that they could grow as like other high political families. causes are searched and people are made sheep in this dirty game showing various reasons to divide people.