Sunday, January 31, 2010

ANDHRA PRADESH - THE RESEARCH LAB

AP has become research lab ever since TRS was formed by KCR in 2001 irrespective of reason. KCR, T congress leaders( some persons), vijaya shanti...attempted to find results of their thoughts and approaches in people of t region.YSR proceeded with development formula and succeeded in his approach, but after his death opportunity again came for KCR...and also separatists in congress and other parties including in centre and those who wants political gains in whole ap so they started game of research.
sociologists, developmental studies researchers, anthropologists,political science researchers...find fertile, readymade place in ap for research in their studies and making political research problem more complex and more importantly maoists doing their best to experiment , implement their approaches in india and using ap situation as a ready made ground for their actions.
we have to understand that if we ask any one of these researchers they will answer differently according to their research, but what needed is not their research but india, unity and diversity of people of india,ap and best interests of people of ap,india present and in future in all angles, for this needed one is long sighted, powerful, unionist, national interest oriented politician who takes decisions in state,region,centre.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

WHAT IS GOING ON- AP ISSUE

no one knows what is going on ap issue with confidence and it can be rightly called with sage chidambara rahasyam. but whether chidambaram know what he is doing is a million dollar question. some one started political game with expecting some thing but games with counter games started resulting in present all confusion state but it is posing serious questions to unity and integrity of telugu people and indian people.as i already said in fore articles there is not even single valid reason to form t state, if it forms then india will divide in near future and plunges in to political crisis and no one knows what will happens as political system fails in country.
decision makers in delhi whether it is sonia or manmohan team did blunder mistake knowingly by declaring t state formation process on dec.9.iam saying dec.9 statement is blunder mistake but it is right from their point of view.
reasons they said to defend their dec.9 statement are
1. t movement is 55 year old,
2. movement arose from people,
3.it has impact on parliament meeting,
4. kcr was on edge of coma/life.
clarifications from me on these reasons.
1. t movement is political only. in 1956 while merging t districts with andhra state it was merged after passing resolution in assembly with 2/3 majority, vishalandhra movement influenced merger of t districts with andhra state, some leaders might have opposed merger, but people wished merger.vishalandhra movement was both in t districts of hyd state, andhra state.
from 1956 to 1969 none either leaders or people voiced for t state, chenna reddy voiced it in 69 for political gain only. and indira assured in clear cut words on united ap forever. from 1969-2001 i.e.till trs formation none voiced or even thought of t state.kcr breathed politically due to tough competition in ap politics in 2004 elections, but no person either from seemandhra, t region is for t state as trs is a party and they felt kcr wants space in politics only.trs completely failed in 2009 elections with t state voice. so people rejected t state. every one is saying every party took t stand in 2009 elections, but truth is 2009 elections were not faught on t issue, no one talked about t issue in elections, development,corruption...are election issues.and no party said it will support t state immediately or in near future and linked their t support with other issues. so no voice in reality, but centre says voice existed.it says voice is 55 years old, so in thie view 55 year old voice irrespective of its existence or genuineness has validity to create state, if this is the case then there are hundreds of regions asking statehood from britishers period, why they are not made states and not considered for statehood. dravida country demand is from independence, why it is not made separate country by bifurcating india.how many years india is going to stay in its present condition? in centre's view as per their dec.9 statement and its defending words on it india is going to be short lived say around 100-200 years. so far india is there from last 5000 years and india formed after colonial rule only 63 years back. where is 63 years, where is 5000 years. is there is any meaning to say that 55 year old voice is a reason for dec.9 statement or creating state.2.
2. t movement is not from people, out of 4 crore people how many people supported t movement and duration of their movement.who did movement, why they did movement, how they did movement, what is the reasons they said for movement-in the movement. out of 4 crores a few thousands did movement, maoists supported movement openly, lies were told to people for movement, people were provoked with hatred towards fellow seemandhra people by lies and tempting words.method of movement is violence,attacks,black mails,warnings...the reasons shown for t state has no validity from any angle and has no justification.students did movement as per govt of india, how many students did movement, how many are willing to do movement , how many want t state...shows students forcefully made to stand with their leaders. why they did movement is also known to people,govt in true terms.so people did not do movement and those did has reasons from their own interests point of view.so govt justification is wrong.
3.parliament did not say give t state, it only said find a way to save kcr from coma problem. that does not mean give t state, even if parliament disrupted what happens, if parliament disturbance is the reason to create state then every one create disturbance to get state for them. so this justification from govt is wrong.
4. kcr fast is drama, treatment shows the will not go in to coma or lose life,people, govt knew this fact well. potti sriramulu died after 58 days with genuine fast, how kcr or any other person dies in a week time even if they do fast in genuine, even if they die can govt create state when there is no genuine reason to form state. this shows govt justification is wrong.

microscopic minority voice got recognition in making dec.9 statement against truth, justice, national interest, genuine interests of people of ap,india. majority voice failed. so what next? these microscopic minority became majority on screen but not in reality due to grab opportunity which came in to their hand by surprise and suppressed true majority voice with use of all means in t region.
the reasons sited for dec.9 statement and reality on ground are contradictory, so every one in india who has separatist thoughts became strong and started, starting their actions. so division of india started both as parts of india and separate from india.
continuous defence of dec.9 statement by centre and efforts it is doing for it and free hand of minority separatists in t region to project themselves as majority and whole also with out checks from any one- govt. proved that any single person or family can get state irrespective of people wish.this minority is doing everything to pressure central govt to stick to dec.9 statement and ensure separation. and became strong due to failure of govt in state, centre in discharging their duties both in decision making, maintaining law and order.so central govt itself created, strengthening separation support in direct, indirect means. its state sponsored separation.politics, counter politics, interests of parties...made present situation putting centre in boiling water surrounded by fire.its an example of suicide of india by itself because of false,selfish thinking of decision makers in delhi.

the above discussion shows that dec.9 statemet was made by central govt run by congress with its allies by knowing all facts. here no answer questions in the minds of people of ap are 1. why rossaiah throw kcr fast problem immediately in to centre court instead of ensuring law and order in state as a chief minister, if he has any problem in maintaining law and order then he should ask help from central govt to ensure additional forces.instead of solving law and problem posed by a small group of people why centre was asked to take decision on t demand immediately, directly with out doing any attempt to protect law and order in state.why state govt headed by rossaiah did not restrict media especially private tv channels from projecting kcr fast as true even after he took juice in khammam itself and why live coverage is not stopped or restricted even it is posing law and order problems.
second -why centre took direct decision when every one knows facts on kcr fast,movement run by trs-students in ou...affiliated to t issue/trs, and facts on ap people wishes, national interest and coming problems...
this political game is dangerous game played by parties in centre, state. it has only negative consequences on ap people, india. what ever the reasons may be behind dec.9 statement from game point of view but it resulted in separatists becoming strong in ap, india. if they are not crushed, defeated completely and un popularised in ap,india...then india will face serious consequences in immediate future starting from ap. movement of kcr can be countered with movement with in t region for united ap, simple problem is solved, why separatists are allowed to get strength and play counter games with party in centre, state , govt in centre.ofcourse separatists have their strategies politically so that they can influence people.
we can analyse dec.9 decision from centre/congress in two angles. first to form t state as every party in state declared in principle support to it as parties are first in democratic set up to know pulse of people in theory. t parties, students and those who are participating in t movement asking t state immediately so state formation process has to be started immediately so that it can not loss votes in t region and as seemandhra people agreed to t state there will be no problem to it there.here parties in principle approval of t state demand is taken as final approval in decision making, if we start discussions then we may loss votes in t region because it will be projected as cheating and discussions will never end towards conclusion, those who are against t state in both regions will follow aicc decision due to decision of sonia as already they followed sonia decision in jagan's case.so it can be win-win to the party and no other demands will be entertained because in ap problem is solved with approval of all people, parties there.
second, trs created tough situation to the congress and against the wishes of all parties except trs. but it got popularity in t region to certain extent so it will remain in 2014 elections, bjp,trs along with main opposition tdp and prp,lok satta will use this issue to defeat congress winning chances in ap/india. so permanent solution has to be found to t issue so that t issue should be no more in ap politics forever. as ysr is not there state leader of congress can not deal with trs problem except jagan but aicc is against making jagan as cm due to their resons so it should solve problem on its own so that it can prove that it is supreme in one hand and save party in ap, india and put it in winning path in 2014 elections. for this if aicc denies t state or crushes t movement with force then it will be counter productive to it, more over many t leaders in state, centre are in favour of t state with in congress so it is a complex one at the same time every one in t region-people,leaders...should know that t state can not be formed in any circumstances by any one who ever sits in delhi chair, this enables permanent end to separation issue.as it checks politicians asking votes in the name of t state irrespective of party.so the approach should be people centric.i.e people will know all problems in separation, discuss among themselves, thinks facts...and makes decision on separation now itself, when people realises all problems in separation process and no possibility for separation and negatives in separation for every one then they dont support separatists from any party in any form and parties will take united ap stand forever.so follow top to bottom approach, against bottom to top approach, top to bottom approach is demanded by separatists, bottom to top approach is ysr statement. every one knows that bottom to top approach means no separation. here point is centre should convince people that it is dedicated to form t state and act accordingly leaving no stone turned but it failed in separation because of facts, obstacles in separation and negatives in separation from people of both regions, ap,india both in short, long term. so bjp can not claim championsip to form t state in any elections as congress failed to form t state even after dedicated efforts, so bjp or any govt can not form due to above said reasons, this should be the conclusion in peoples mind. so with one stroke all problems will solve.so follow separatists favour approach with start and slowly shift to unionists favour by siting facts.committee of experts will provide facts here so that no political gain can be obtained from it, problem is solved both with in party, congress problem in ap, congress problem in delhi.
if we see statements of chidambaram and actions of delhi from dec.9 we can sense second angle. first direct statement on t state process, dec.23. second statement- wide range of consultations-one step down, third- committee of experts formation-two steps down, next will be committee recommendation in 2-3 years favouring united ap, then decision will be united ap from govt and congress party stand point siting facts, recommendations of committee, next will be tdp openly taking united ap stand safely siting committee recommendations, and also political counter to congress.those who remains with t stand still after committee recommendation will get defeated in elections due to understanding of facts by people.
during committee tenure all ground work will be done from leaders, people , development point of view towards united ap through political strategies, powerful cm, fast development...jagan may be cm in immediate future-3-6 months,1 year as he is need now irrespective of aicc wish.trong points for second approach- more than 90% of t people are in favour of united ap now, those advocating separation are with ultra methods and they are not touched so far to suppress them with law,by votes separatists has no support once they are isolated on any reason base, once that reason is from valid source then parties will be safe due to their early mistake while allying with trs...
if seconf approach is right then trs will be no more in ap politics and separatist voice will be no more. if first approach is right then all separatists will get strength and t will form.

here terms of references to the committee, validity to the committee report, who heads committee, who will be the members of committee and time of report submission in reality by the committee and the report content are crucial. we know that committee will not solve problem, but it will create conditions favourable for solving problem- time, justice, facts...making people think, know facts and take decisions on sound grounds, on other side committee time will enable party in power or opposition to take political actions with in their parties and it is also true that only time can solve complex problems, so committee time will solve problem.finally committee report or content will enable parties to justify their decisions when committee favours their wish in reality. so committee is crucial and political steps are crucial, both play equal role here, thats why when govt decides to form committee terms of reference, report, report validity will play key role. so united ap leaders must be careful as people, leaders in united ap side do not trust central govt at present, future because of aicc favourability to separatists. of course whether it is truly favourable to separatists or unionists on ground will be kn own only in commitee report and political actions and changes it introduces in ap politics during committee tenure itself, but chance should not be given to centre alone to decide on united ap status so options should be kept with united ap leaders to accept or reject committee report, as report is nothing but views of some menbers, who ever they may be they are humans more over no judge gives same judgement on same issue, if every judge gives same judgement then why judgements are taken by majority view and appeal system is there.and terms of reference should not be on top to bottom approach.

if congress itself is behind this game from kcr fast drama then it will follow first one, if it has no hand behind this crisis and wants to save unity and integrity of country and works for justice,facts then it will follow second approach. irrespective of reason if congress follows first one then it is committing suicide in india and putting india in danger, if it follows second one then it will get its lost national party status. the situation in telangana is completely different from dec.9 as t parties, leaders became strong with it and putting their best behind it. lets see, how delhi handles

in people's view congress started this game to achieve something in party but it landed in crisis and put state,india in crisis as things went out of its hand and became counter productive with check-check strategy. what cong do now

so far united ap activists, activities are silent in hyd/t region. mim and cpm are also silent. unionists are doing attempts to enter, check separatists championship of separatist voice as projecting themselves as sole representatives of t voice in toto and there is no unionist voice in t region. already stage managed t show is becoming thin and true face of this fake movement is visible clearly to every one. OU university which claimed championship on t issue is no more, unionist voice in OU came to surface as they are silent so far due to different reasons, MIM is also may become active if they think they need to act and unionist meeting in hyd/t region, students starting to enter in to hyd,t region through marches as every unionist is doing their efforts to enter in to t region in one form or another and t voice raisers are attacking with words so far and dont know what happens in immediate days.

its only my prediction. wait and see results, what will match with my thoughts- first or second



Friday, January 29, 2010

POLITICS ONLY WILL DEFEAT, SOLVE SEPARATISM

Separatism in ap is a political problem started by an unemployed politician for his selfish gains. they in the form of party mixed their selfish interests with votes, thus it got in to news irrespective of facts on what they say to people on separatism. cut throat competition in ap politics and priority to minimise votes division to the maximum extent gave life to these separatists, but people utterly defeated these separatists.now these separatists choose movement path after fixing major parties in flux on separatism issue and the approach is undemocratic with use of money, pressure, warnings,attacks,black mails...thus anarchism entered in to state with weak cm providing fertile ground to it.
forming or merging new state or states has become simple issue with dec.9 statement of chidambaram taken by sonia gandhi.now after fierce opposition from people aicc is moving towards committee, but its not a solution, as they raked problem politically and wants to solve it with judiciary.but judiciary will aid only to create temporary peace from violence, but it will not solve problem.
problem should be solved with politically only, let elections come in peace then separatism will find no place in ap.today everyone state parties supported t state in election manifestos. tomorrow in elections as now every party realised true nature of trs.
simple problem solved. but there should be peace up to 2014 elections, centre has to assure this peace in one way or other so that people should know facts and every one should propagate their views in peace. before that central govt should issue white paper on all projects carried out in ap from 1956 and its state before 1956 , intention of projects and beneficiaries of projects...so that people can know all facts.non government organisations-NGOs- also will campaign in elections their views either for samikyandhra, separation and explain everything to the people.then see who will win.
telangana districts became part of andhra state after people there accepted merger in elections, but now they want no people mandate.now people should decide who is these nonsense politicians to decide people fate, people of ap will decide their future.once merger happens then division happens only with wishes of all people but not with wishes of only those who merged, as those who allowswed merger must accept separation,earlier they accepted merger now they must accept separation also. then see result. today they are saying parties took t stand so t state has to be formed, tomorrow parties take united ap stand, then what they say?all this is nonsense being run by raskel politicians.
ap is the only state that can not be divided, if it is divided on any ground then all india will divide in to maximum states.ap is role model for evrything.these fellows are demanding state just 60 years after independence,and 55 years after state formation, 55 years is a negligible time in nation's history.
i will write later

Monday, January 25, 2010

ROLE OF PRP IN AP POLITICS

PRP took socialist telangana stand in elections. it never said it is in favor of separate telangana. but what ever word comes from any party on t issue is/was only in diplomatic language, trs did not follow diplomatic words.trs always followed direct words and propagated stands of other parties also in direct words irrespective of parties stand on t issue.as people understand direct words, people votes. all parties congress,tdp,prp,lok satta never condemned trs propagation of their stands in direct words.
PRP took U turn after dec.9.to protect united AP. its welcome move from political point of view and from united ap point of view and also from PRP party point of view. PRP won only 2 MLA seats in t region, 2 corporator seats in GHMC elections. so it has no base in t region including hyd, but it has strong base in seemandhra where it got 18 MLA seats and influenced poll out come in many constituencies. seemandhra people are openly in favour of united ap. so from party point PRP took right stand in right time.even it supports t issue it will not be having space in t politics even if t forms due to presence of large number of parties- congress,tdp,bjp,trs,mim,lok satta,cpi,cpm...but assembly seats are only 119 including hyd, if hyd is not included in t region then only 99 will remain in t state.no party will get majority, every time coalition govt will stay in power, even after seat sharing single party may get 10-15 seats, out of them how many it wins is a million dollar question. so prp wisely left t region.if it sticks to t stand then it will certainly lose ground in seemandhra.
prp remains the sole champion of united ap party now from open party stand, when a small party like trs was able to create present situation by political steps then why not prp from united ap side. it will definitely influence politics from state to central level. it already started acting with diplomacy first and chiranjeevi meeting upa allies...even he has no MPs he will influence politics in centre. trs has only 2 MPs. having MPs or not is not the matter here, t issue will not be solved over night. it will take years. even if congress, tdp decides to give t state then prp will check their future in seemandhra thus it will force congress,tdp work more towards united ap. if elections comes due to this cause then ultimately every party in state, national level must follow united ap stand in clear cut terms other wise they lose votes in seemandhra and united ap voters in hyd,t region.its big.only trs ,cpi,bjp will remain with t voice but their influence is low and winning chances are also low.thus if elections comes united ap voice will win, other wise prp will force cong,tdp to work for united ap in back door and ensure no division of state. if no one voices politically for united ap then thinking of cong,tdp will be different as their seemandhra leaders are voicing for united ap. but they are with in party, prp is party and goes to people seeking their mandate and will expose all activities of tdp,cong.so powerful political check emerged to trs from united ap view point. cong,tdp has to decide whether to follow trs,or prp stands in elections as both is championing single cause.cong,tdp must find solution by not giving scope to prp,trs to win in elections,obviously it will be late process and favourable to united ap.as majority voice, capitalists voice, national interest,unity voice...will only win.
cong,tdp was able to support trs stand in indirect words because no party supported united ap in clear words and has the ability to divide votes,except cpm party. but cpm is a small party and can not influence out come of elections on the whole.now prp took clear stand towards united ap, and that too in needed time and has the capacity to not only divide votes but win large chunk of seats. in telangana trs has the capacity only to divide votes in limited constituencies, it did not had the capability even to contest all seats in t region. so politics will swing towards united ap by 2014 elections. as dividion will benefit trs,bjp in t region and prp in seemandhra irrespective of what ever say cong,tdp on division ultimately only these parties will benefit more if division happens. in seemandhra prp certainly wins majority seats. in t region trs will get capacity to contest all seats with confidence, enough cong,tdp will sit in home as bjp has strength in t region, muslims will float t region wide party as they have influencing vote share and fear of bjp,trs, so fight becomes between bjp-mim,cong-trs and a mix of them, tdp will wind up.bjp,trs are first in provocations, muslims are worst affected. to day provocations are going on towards seemandhra people, tomorrow it will be between t people-muslims as muslims are past rulers and has considerable vote share in t region so provocations will start.in any angle cong will loss in seemandhra and reduces to third party status in t region.so MP seats in centre will be in single digit from present ap for congress.
its the leadership, diplomacy of prp leader that can influence any what i said in fore words, but prp never utilised opportunity so far, it gave grand entry in to ap politics but failed with in months, now also it is not doing anything to influence any one, it just gave open support to united ap and sitting back looking for some one who could do anything so that it can follow them.

SEPARATISM CAUSES- STATES

1. unity in diversity of country, scope to divide people is maximum with out touching indian concept.
2. democratic set up,where people are decision makers. people mind can be managed easily with existing diversities in india.
3. weak congress party in centre, its national party status is going back elections after elections in states,centre.
4. no alternative to congress party in centre, here congress itself is weak, so parties near to congress try their best to run from delhi.
5. emergence of mushroom parties in state, regional level parties with diversity basis to the maximum extent.emergence of many leaders on one ground or other and fight between them for space in politics,political employment.
6. planned development of country is slow and took 50 years to get identifiable start, it is slow because of poor economic state of country in 1947,partition of india, wars, excess population, limited/no technology...but politics dont say this to people, they exploit problems only.
7. planned pooling of resources and concentration of development in certain regions/cities to meet india demands as a whole. it solved india's problems but resulted in regional imbalances, politics got space to exploit these imbalances on one hand to protect development by not sharing with others on other hand.some sections insociety became strong, some sections lagging behind giving rise to various political ideologies.
8. coalition politics getting importance due to no national parties in reality. so single MP seat is important to form,run govt in centre.
9. process to fill the gap between regions in development started a few years back only with activeness as country met its needs with surplus production recently only. corruption in development associated works influences politics.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

TOUGH DAYS AHEAD

AP is going to witness tough days in immediate days. as i said in my past articles trs is fighting for its survival and its survival is based on t issue only that too its active role in t solution. it will not let anything go out of its hand and do its best to scuttle everything which undermines its survival, fame. so it continues create more and more problems by any means so that only it could rule things in t region and t issue. on the other hand all parties in t region blindly stepped in to the game of trs from last 9 years by undermining its true nature irrespective of reasons. trs will do its best to pull thread till it breaks.congress,tdp,bjp should be careful in this respect.the jac is nothing but trs , as it is controlled by trs. kodandaram reddy is a trs person right form trs formation. trs is forcing centre,congress to do something, something with t state as focus, so how long congress,centre elongate, already centre made trs hands strength with blunder dec.9 statement. even after it made dec.23. statement trs is projecting only dec.9 statement forgetting latest statement.it is getting handful help from all corners due to dec.9 statement, but not from core people and united ap leaders in t region.
trs is doing its best to widen the gap between people,leaders of seemandhra, t region by all means.provocation,hatred...are its approach.
on the other hand seemandhra,samaikyandhra leaders in t region has to do counter to stop centre from doing fault again and reduce voice of trs and its allies.they are moving in that direction.
onething here every one should note that trs, t leader/people who are raising, fighting for t state knows well that their demand, fight has no justice and no reason but still they are doing with all wrong means only with selfish motive.it is against trust which was generated during ap formation, after 55 years gap they are ready to cheat seemandhra people and let them with empty hands. and also offering talks on dividing and their full support to the seemandhra leaders. its trap to seemandhra leaders. no one should believe t leaders as they are cheating after 55 years when united then how they will abide to the agreements made during bifurcation, if bifurcation happens. they will throw them in to dust bin immediately. we have seen how they behaved and acted immediately after dec.9 statement. with just start of formation statement only they started all activities against seemandhra leaders and their interests and people of seemandhra by simply forgetting 55 years good relationship,and good done by seemandhra leaders to the people of t region. then how can seemandhra leaders,people believe t leaders on any issue if bifurcation happens.certainly not , seemandhra will loss peermanently if bifurcation happens. every one knows that t movement is aimed at what. then how can trust will come on t leaders.
kcr already declared t movement will not stop even after t formation, it will run till t is completely restructured. this means they have complete agenda in hidden. maoist agenda, t leaders agenda...are mixed here.
i think seemandhra leaders and democratic leaders in t region are observing it.
trs actions and counter actions from seemandhra leaders will be the future of ap.seemandhra leaders so far did not act in reality. once they start acting then we have to see what happens. centre is sleeping in delhi safely with its agenda in pocket after firing peaceful house.
if seemandhra leaders believe words of t leaders and agree for bifurcation irrespective of the reason then they will loss permanently what they have achieved for seemandhra people, for themselves from last 55 years.alternatives is different issue, certainly loss will exist and its magnitude is known to these seemandhra leaders till they regains present status in economy in alternate location.why they should shift forcefully and lose their properties,money.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

MY PERSONALITY TEST RESULTS-BRIEF( dont take it seriously)

personality type: "Reliable Realist"

Serious and quiet, interested in security and peaceful living. Extremely thorough, responsible and dependable. Well-developed powers of concentration. Usually interested in supporting and promoting traditions and establishments. Well-organized and hard working, they work steadily towards identified goals. They can usually accomplish any task once they have set their mind to it.

Careers that could fit include:

Business executives, administrators and managers, accountants, police, detectives, judges, lawyers, medical doctors, dentists, computer programmers, systems analysts, computer specialists, auditors, electricians, math teachers, mechanical engineers, steelworkers, technicians.



Friday, January 22, 2010

NO REFERENDUM ON T ISSUE*

Referendum is not preferable on T issue, not only T issue , referendum is not preferable on any political issue in India. Referendum or plebiscite means asking voter to select choice among two- yes or no-. if T people says 'yes' to T state then state has to be formed, if t people say 'no' then state will not be formed. but it fails to solve problem on one hand and creates more problems india wide on other hand. asking for referendum means indian govt expressing its willingness to form t state if people accepts. when govt is willing to form new state then majority of people will ask for new state as they interprets referendum as an opportunity to get state irrespective of need for new state and its impact on them and on others and on india as a whole. politicians who are asking separatism will provocate people by all means during campaign resulting in crossing desired cut off mark in result. the atmosphere is already charged in t region now, in charged atmosphere decisions of people will be wrong. plebiscite will count majority voice only, then what about minority voice. even if minority voice is genuine then they will not get result in their favour. it becomes more people race rather than all people race. here criteria should be to solve all problems of all people but not whether to give state or not.
referundum is misnomer concept in reality. people's wish can be manipulated easily. so whenever people's wish changes can govt change its decision and create or merge states. if that was the case then for every five years more or less more states has to be created and merged with other states. it is not possible in reality. in t issue problem is political in nature and people has no role in it. un necessarily people are dragged in to it especially students. political problems has to be solved politically with discussions and with out any campaign/provocation etc and in peace.if a solution is reached to divide state then it can be put for referendum if need is felt with freedom to both parties separatists,unionists both with in the region to campaign for and against separation and campaign has to be peaceful and no party comes against each other and rules has to be followed.but here situation is completely reverse. from last 9 years trs is provocating people,promoting hatred, telling lies to people , naxals are directly involving in all activities, centre did wrong by dec.9 statement, attacks are going on against unionists....so plebiscite is not the option.
hyderabad, settled people in telangana from other parts of state, muslims in hyd, t region, economic interests of people from different parts of state in hyd/t region, river waters sharing, and above all trust,...problems are there .for them referendum will not give answer.
the reasons put forward by separatists for separation are baseless and not a single reason is convincing in nature.so the separation issue itself has no moral basis forget about other things.
referendum should be on broad issue only, like merge or separation of one country with other country or adoption of framing on constitution etc...only.here in t issue all problems are internal, specific .so referendum has no value here.indian people are not that much enlightened to analyse every thing and decide the fate of politicians, here politicians make,create peoples will by exploiting ignorance of people.
conducting referendum in t is not advisable on issue, referendum has to be conducted in entire ap. if that was the case then t voice will be defeated utterly. but from democracy point of view it will not be sound but facts point of view it is correct. here contradiction comes, so disputes arises. so referendum is not advisable.
if referendum is conducted on t issue in state or t region that does not matter but it will open entire country in to referendum on state formation and separation from india. pak asking for referendum in kashmir long ago, here fact is only ap has complex situation and unionists are present in t region, but in other cases almost 90% will be for separation only, how many states will indian govt will form and how many will separate from india is no answer question.ultimately there will be no india.

THE DEMOCRATIC WAY WITH DIPLOMACY,FORCE.*

Appoint a committee or commission of experts with supreme court judge as chairman. appoint historians, sociologists,anthropologists,planning commission members,politicians from both united ap -t voice, industry experts, security experts...to study ap problems in depth and take views of all stake holders in person- residents of hyd, t region,seemandhra,seemandhra residents in t region/hyd,muslims in hyd,muslims in t region,muslims in seemandhra,industry-all industries,farmer assosiations,universities....on their problems so far as ascribed by separatists.
collect all data from central state govts on investments in entire state and their intentions and benefits to all people, ascertain relative worth of development from 1956 by applying economy of india,ap and problems of india,ap and ground situation in 1956 in every district and present situation. take planning commission role as crucial part here. relative development of each district has to be compared with obstacles point of view also while assessing its development as obstacles play crucial role in determining the pace of development.
give mandate to the commission to recommend feasible solutions to development of all people of ap by keeping in mind best interests of people of ap in short,long term and protecting ,promoting unity and integrity of people of state, country and protecting, promoting interests of every stake holder in state in all aspects both present and in future.
fix a time frame of 5 years as time for submitting report.as it is a huge task. definitely it will run for atleast 20 years even if every one looked for it.
give directions to head of commission, and its members to recommend united ap solution as the only solution. it should be an agreement form between govt,commission head/members in covert.
appoint united ap favouring leaders from t region as commission's members, but before project them as strong t leaders in public,political circles by targeted campaign.

once peace comes in to state and commission starts its functioning then no one thinks about commission's report as t sentiment is nothing but nonsense and shallow , baseless argument for separate state. even if any one voices then show commission as solution provider.

politically win people support with strong leader running state.all development activities in all districts, elimination of anti social elements with firm hand and political suicides/eliminations will put separatist voice in ocean bottom.

in the mean while politics will cahnge in state as now they have experienced fate of taking separatist voice lightly and playing vote bank politics. now they start eliminating separatist voice getting strength. already PRP took united ap as its stand, other parties will definitely support united ap voice other wise they lose maximum votes from united ap supporters who are all over state.
people will realise there will be no separation forever due to complexity in ap issues. they dont support separatists thus these separatists becomes baseless. on other hand no one is supporting separation now itself . so there will be no one in future also. generation change will erode all selfish politics.increase in awareness of people will defeat every game of politicians.

i propose this approach if problem too much complex and tough, but now situation is simple, no movement is there in reality, no people support is there in genuine perspective,separatists are a few only but they are using central govt decision makers stupid thinking. there is no need to go for long approach. what needed is central govt should act with firm stand to defeat separatism, if it acts rightly then problem will be solved with in months/days. if it is stubborn and dont want risk follow long term path. short term approach which i said in fore article ensures end to political instability, thus assures people, industry, development activities immediately but it needs strong leader to implement it rightly and defeat opponents as opponents will put their best to create problems. on the other hand long term approach will elongate political instability and voice will raise or down depending on the ability of united ap leaders, separatist leaders and politics at centre.in the coalition politics separatists will get strength if leader is strong compared to united ap leader. now ap has weak leader compared to separatist leader.more over long term approach means leaving solution to next generations with out putting end to it permanently when opportunity came in. but if cm is strong then short or long term both work, so make cm strong and follow short approach, now cm is weak, so use power in his name by making him as symbolic, crush fake movement, eliminate problem then appoint strong person as cm to win those who pained due to crush policy, so all won,problem solved forever. whether aicc has guts to do?it is not headed by indira gandhi.




Tuesday, January 19, 2010

INDIAN GOVT DUTY

try with words to convince t leaders for united ap state forever. if they dont listen use force irrespective of party put all separatists behind bars. tackle student agitators with iron hand. cut maoist help to students,political leaders and hunt maoists in t region and border states.declare holidays to all universities in t region up to problem is solved-1 or 2 months as revision dead line-, declare in clear cut words that division of ap is not the wish of govt of india in any circumstances to protect interests of all people of state and india as a whole and ap will be united forever. all those who ever takes law in to their hands will be punished. ban media news related to t violence/fake movement/suicides/speeches,interviews of t supporters who ever they may be, media should be ordered to telecast united ap voice in genuine way. in national interest all these can be done as per constituition, use them to solve problem and ensure peace,development, unity and integrity of country. ban telangana talli concept/idol/song an declare it as anti india.declare all facts on whatever separatists propagated so far to further their interests through media to the people. prosecute all those who promoted violence from party leaders to street candidate,university staff...declare that no case will be lifted against any one including kcr. and no compensation will be provided for those who committed suicide as suicide is a crime and suicide was done to influence govt decision in un appropriate way. those who promote suicides by offering incentives to the families will be prosecuted and their properties will be ceased as offering incentives to suicides means encouraging suicides directly. and order enquiries in to activities that were carried out to topple govt, divide people of india with hatred base, attacks on properties,businesses....

whatever i said is a solution from authority point of view. i follow authoritarian principle in administration. but authoritarianism should be democratic,i.e.decisions should be taken by keeping in view genuine interests of people in short,long term but its implementation should be with iron hand as many obstacles will come in genuine way due to self interests of many people and their number is maximum,so democratic way will not work in implementation. problems of complex nature can not be solved only democratically,iron hand must be used .if govt do whtever people says then why govt there.people can rule themselves. people are sheep.people mindset is on wall always, any one can turn it in their way if they convince people on any ground whether it is genuine reason or lie that does not matter,if people back good reason then we should back people ,if people back wrong reason then we should use iron hand. govt has to function keeping best interests of country,people in both short,long term. even 100% of people says something is peoples wish then it should not be done unless it has justice and helps in development, peace of people and national unity & integrity in short,long term and acts as a role model to solve other problems.

if peoples voice is true then india has to give freedom to nagas,bodos,ulfa,mizos,manipuris...tribes in north east, south india should be made separate country by dividing it from india, kashmir vally should be handed over to pakistan.....why nehru,patel,indira did not do them. in terms of size if telangana people are 3 crores so they have genuine reason-this is the reason from some persons point of view, if that is the case then south india has tens of crores of population, can indian govt gives freedom to it to become separate country. south india freedom voice will get support more strongly than t voice once campaign starts. its not the matter of size of population, its the matter of genuineness and its compatibility with national interest and best interests of people. from this angle t voice is nothing but nonsense. t leaders also say we are indians and we are not asking separation from india , we are asking only state. but the ideology they are following , nurturing is against india. india has only one mother to their land-bharat matha, where did telangana talli came with in india with in days after trs formation when no person india,t region thought of this concept in dream also. trs supporters openly declared if separate state is not given to them then they start movement for separate country and use pending case in UN on hyderabad state issue. and also once t state forms then next step will be out of india only. above all t state is being demanded on no reason except self respect when they are ruling it from independence. so self respect itself has no basis here. then for what they are demanding and committing all types of nonsense. all other political leaders in india keenly watching t issue for getting clues out of it for their self interests,when kcr is able to carve a state for him in a state where there is no reason to give state then what about rest of india. central govt gave dec.9 statement by fearing to the demand of kcr, after that they are saying this or that,once statement came irrespective of its genuineness t leaders decided to put everything behind it to get confirmation, so started all nonsense in the name of movement as early govt declared by seeing this fake things only so now repeat it as long as we get what we want approach. if kcr's fake fast resulted in dec.9 statement in clear cut terms then tomorrows movements will result in confirmation, so go ahead is the signal they got from dec.9 statement. after that also centre called for jan.5 discussions after t leaders agitated, now they are agitating again for confirmation.how long govt will give statements after statement with out confirming? its not possible, so govt is in flux, t leaders exploiting it. its suicide of govt with foolish thinking. it said parties lied with it on dec.7. congress the main party in centre, state decides its policies,strategies from janpath only, why blame others.what is the need to give final statement on dec.9 instead it could have called for all parties discussion in delhi by taking a month gap. kcr is not going to die, everybody knew it including govt.even if he dies nothing will happens tot he country. if govt gives a state to protect life of an MP or MLA then every MP,MLA is ready to die to assure a state for their generations in india, can govt give states.old age MPs, MLAs will be first in the race.

i will write more points later

RESULTS OF T MOVEMENT

1. t people are the worst affected people. whether t forms or not they are going to face worst in future for supporting t movement or keeping quietly when few persons voicing in their way for t state.
if t is formed then people will loss as i said in other articles. if t is not formed then these people has to pay damages they did so far. they did damage to trust, which can not come over a night. it will take many decades again and that too if complete favourable conditions prevail. seemandhra leaders, investors including investors from other states/countries will not allow t leaders to dictate policies in any way and cm post will be day dream for t leaders , even if cm post comes they can not function or take decisions as seemandhra leaders will check them everywhere. development activities in t region will move in new direction with diplomacy playing pivotal role. industries developed complete negative attitude towards t students from last 2 months, it results in avoidance of t students in their companies till they get confidence on t students. nobody knows how much time it will takes as its a matter of trust, trust needs many years to build, destruction can happen in seconds. even if t forms then t students face same situation and loss of idustries or hyd stagnation will result in loss of opportunities which they are supposed to get if division did not take place.

2. a new ideology came in to focus in the country to divide state, country. if t forms then it will show its real face making india in to pieces and some parts separating from india and in that process india and particularly people of those regions will experience its fatal consequences.

3. all parties in state, national leavel divided vertically with dec.9 statement of chidambaram. in state it is visible, forget about the time of these divisions-short lived or permanent-, but in national these divisions are waiting for result on t issue. many parties witnessing divisions before itself. leaders became helpless. when there is no leader then who will control all anti social elements and ensure peace, no one, only anarchism will prevail. we have to go to RECLUS thoughts anarchism who advocated statelessness, but if everything is ok then there is no need for leader, leader is needed when there is a simple problem, when problem itself for leaders then who will lead. anarchism with its ugly form will rule ultimately its the ARMY of india that is going to take up delhi chair as politicians failed. so india will never come to democracy once army takes civil roles also. amar singh splitted samajwadi party for fighting for new states as mulayam advocated unified up.tn, ka...every state has more and more state demands. lets see how sonia makes india in to pieces by negotiating with mindless team in govt. no fool could have made dec.9 statement, but it was did by democratic govt at centre which is responsible for unity and integrity of the country, it failed in its duty in critical time and opened india in to severe problems threatening unity and integrity of india on one hand and putting india back on development path on other hand and no peace with gift. if things go beyond hand then army is the option to rule country, army never thought of that situation since 1947 eventhough usa...powers expected army rule in india, but time may easily come for army rule if govt in centre fails to eliminate t voice and keep ap united irrespective of the method it chooses for this- talks, diplomacy, police or military.it made blunder mistake on crucial issue which plays with peace,lives,law and order,unity and integrity of country...it should correct it in any way by using all methods to control all nonsense elements as single method will not serve purpose. if it fails to do it then it should be ready to face nation wide problems.it has to put its brain.these economists are playing with people,countries. they dont know their subject well even after their life time research/study/experiments, they dont think in political way, all there manmohan/chidambaram/pranab are economists , sonia is not a politician and dont know indian people mindset correctly.unfortunately they are decision makers.
the politics of AP is not a smooth one, who ever gets win in ap politics will be the strongest leader in centre also, it is because of tough competition and circumstances in ap politics. past shows this fact right from ap formation the leader who ever ruled ap or had grip on ap politics influenced nation politics and revolutionized also. only political minds can understand and solve ap problems.sonia is scape goat on this issue, she gave word to t leaders, blindly proceeded a step forward, then she realised its blunder mistake, as congress is committing suicide not only in ap but also in entire india. now she has to step back carefully using this step as a tool to eliminate separatists out rightly. formation of t state is not at all solution to the problems of ap. rather it will creates more complex problems in ap, india. ap politics has influence on politics of entire country right from independence, UP might have more seats in parliament but its ap that is influencing politics with strength of leadership,ideology...MP was divided during congress rule in 2000, till today congress did not come to power there.BJP is ruling MP,CH from 2004 elections even there are strong failures of govt in both states. in JH congress lost everything in reality, BJP formed govt from its formation,in BH congress has no place,only in Uttaranchal congress bounce back but it will be temporary only as BJP is strong there and BJP lost in 2009 not because of congress supremacy but because of its own mistakes.now ap has problem if ap is divided then congress should be ready to suicide.many state demands, no one knows which party remains in centre, state.

3. kcr stated trs by taking corrupt, tainted sibu soren as role model and fighting for t state on screen irrespective of his real intentions resulting in creation of present day anarchism in ap and would be anarchism in india in future. with dec.9 statement kcr got plenty of followers in entire india. every leader in nook and corner of country is working out their path to carve separate state for them, parties became parts, already some people like amar singh started action in planned way and others agitated so far in one form or other but seriously chalking out their ways. lets see. this kcr dipped not only t people but also entire india in to trouble, those sitting at janpath lost trust in people. lets see whether these fellows wakes up and solves problem or creates more serious problems.

4. t voice strategy: telling lies continuously, maintaining media presence every day, training a group of agitators to agitate every where for helping separatist leader in the way leaders wish, targetting students and mind wash of students and leaving them against separation opposing persons/leaders/govt... along with trained party cadre, forcing every one to spell out their views on separation everywhere and repeatedly, forcing leaders to resign etc... attacking separation opposing leaders/people/businesses...,using media extensively for everything with separation voice, hatred promotion, drawing divisions everywhere, black mailing, self interests getting priority,....politicians knew them in old days but they did not use them recently believing that people changed and law will act against them but t showed that people did not change and they are ready to cooperate and law also blind. easily every politician likes this.

5. irrespective of t state formation most of industries including film industry will vacate hyd enmass or slowly depending on the out come of t issue. they move to vizag to assure their future and abandon t region,hyd so that they can sleep peacefully with no future threat,blackmail from any one on any reason. film industry is against t formation and it is started moving to vizag since trs formation and demanding land...from govt in vizag since trs formation. so lakhs of telanganites who are employed in film industry will loss jobs. only RFC will remain in hyd, hindi film industry will not come as there is no difference between MNS, TRS and their ideology and attitude towards well off. other industries which are owned, promoted,aided by seemandhra industrialists will leave hyd as trs,t leaders targets are these industries only, once one industry moves others will move automatically due to dependence, complementarity,offers in new location... so telangana industry workers will lose jobs, they have to wait for industries to start, but losing industries is easy, but not starting industries. entrepreneurs will not prefer t region because of maoism, early treatment to fellow telugu industrialists, magnets in the form of vizag,vijayawada attracting investments,assured know how supply in seemandhra, no future threats,ports, fast developed international air ports, and all of the above planned development starting afresh in new location with all resources in hand. in any way its the t people,industries,workers,students will lose. the hatred will not allow t people to get jobs in seemandhra even if they say brotherhood.it will be permanent boundary in reality eventhough both are in india.it may take 1-3 years for industries to start operations in vizag, film industry can move with in months as studio construction is only simple matter, once govt provides land for studios,labs and house sites..then it will be little matter of time and already film industry has studios in vizag.

Monday, January 18, 2010

IF TELANGANA FORMS

1. INDUSTRIES WHICH CAME TO HYD BY SEEING UNITED AP AND CAN NOT SURVIVE OR FEEL NEGATIVE TO STAY IN T STATE WILL LEAVE. AS BUSINESS LOCATION AND ITS TIME IS NOT IMPORTANT. ASSURANCE TO BUSINESS, INVESTMENTS AND SUPPORTING ENVIRONMENT IS IMPORTANT. INDUSTRIES CAME TO HYD BY SEEING, TRUSTING SEEMANDHRA LEADERS ONLY AS CMs.
2. INVESTMENTS OF SEEMANDHRA WILL LEAVE HYD TO RELOCATE THEMSELVES IN THEIR CAPITAL AS THEY SHOULD DEVELOP THEIR CAPITAL. COMPETITIOR TO HYD EMERGES IN THE FORM OF VISHAKA PATNAM, VIJAYAWADA. COMPARED TO HYD THESE TWO WILL BE LUCRATIVE TO INVESTORS FROM WITH IN AP AND FROM OUT SIDE WHEN SUBSIDIES ARE GIVEN, THEY WILL DEFINITELY GIVE IT TO DEVELOP THEIR CAPITAL, INVESTMENTS, INDUSTRIES ETC...RAPIDLY. SO VIZAG, VIJAYAWADA MAGNETS ATTRACTS AND ABSORBS INDUSTRIES FROM HYD. PEOPLE SUPPORT IN QUALITY,QUANTITY IS HIGH, BUT ONCE SEEMANDHRA KNOW HOW PEOPLE LEAVE HYD THEN TELANGANITES CAN NOT PROVIDE NEEDED QUALITY,QUANTITY KNOW HOW PEOPLE TO INDUSTRY. WHEN VIZAG, VIJAYAWADA STARTS FUNCTIONING INDUSTRIALLY OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE FROM THESE REGIONS WILL COME AND SETTLE IN THESE REGIONS. SO FAR WE ARE SHOWING VIZAG AS PORT TO HYD,IF DIVISION TAKES PLACE THEN VIZAG,VIJAYAWADA WILL GET MORE OPPORTUNITIES. PEOPLE HAS MONEY, TECHNICAL KNOW HOW, PEACEFUL PLACE, NO NAXALISM, NEAR TO PORT, NH, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT IN VIZAG , INCENTIVES FROM GOVT, ASSURED POLITICAL STABILITY...EVERYTHING WILL COME AS SEEMANDHRA LEADERS ARE INVESTORS AND PUT IN PLACE WHATEVER THEY WANT IN FAST TIME.
3. DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENTS IN HYD WILL LEAVE HYD TO ANOTHER PLACE. GOVT OF INDIA WILL NOT RISK TO LEAVE THEM TO NAXALS THREAT. AND NEVER INTENDS TO KEEP GUARD OF DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENTS IN HYD ON ITS OWN BY NOT TRUSTING STATE GOVT.
4. FILM INDUSTRY WILL DIVIDE. MAXIMUM PRODUCERS,ACTORS, DIRECTORS ETC...ARE FROM SEEMANDHRA AND DONT WANT T LEADERS CONTROL IN COMPLETE OVER THEM. IRRESPECTIVE OF MARKET SLOWLY THEY SHIFTS TO VIZAG. ALREADY FILM INDUSTRY IS ASKING PLACE FOR THEM IN VIZAG SINCE TRS FORMATION SO THAT THEY COULD DEVELOP THERE INSTEAD OF HYD. IN HYD ONLY RAMOJIRAO STUDIO IS PERMANENT. ALL OTHERS CAN SHIFT READILY BY CONSTRUCTING BUILDINGS IN VIZAG AND SHIFTING EQUIPMENTS. SEEMANDHRA MARKET IS MORE THAN TELANGANA. VIZAG IS MORE SUITABLE PLACE FOR FILMS THAN HYD IN TERMS OF CLIMATE, PEACEFULNESS, AND MEN SUPPORT OF LIKE MINDED PEOPLE. IN TELANGANA THEY HAS TO WORK AS PER T LEADERS WISHES WHO ARE AGAINST THEM INDUSTRIALLY AND STARTS DOMINATING, DICTATING THEM.IF THEY MAKE MOVIES BY KEEPING TELANGANA LEADERS WISHES IN MIND THEY WILL LOSS MARKET IN SEEMANDHRA, KARNATAKA, TAMIL NADU,ORISSA,MUMBAI, USA, EUROPE AND MANY PARTS OF TELANGANA INCLUDING HYD. SO THEY SHIFTS TO VIZAG, SO CALLED FILM INDUSTRY BASED PERSONS FROM T REGION ALSO SHIFTS TO VIZAG IF THEY WANT TO SURVIVE. BUT THE MASS WORKERS LOSS. AS INDUSTRY IN VIZAG WILL NOT EMPLOY T PEOPLE.
4. THE VALUE OF HYD PROPERTIES WILL GO DOWN DUE TO EMPTYING OF CITY BY MAXIMUM PEOPLE. REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY WILL FUMBLE.
5. INVESTORS FROM OTHER STATES WILL NOT COME AT LEAST IN REASONABLE SIZE. BECAUSE OF FLY AWAY OF TRUST FROM POLITICAL SIDE, VIZAG/VIJAYAWADA EMERGING AS COMPETITORS ALONG WITH PRESENT BANGLORE,CHENNAI,MUMBAI-PUNE AND NAGPUR ALSO EMERGES DUE TO MOVEMENT THERE FOR STATEHOOD.NAXALISM, NO QUALITY,QUANTITY OF PEOPLE AS PER INDUSTRY NEEDS, FLYING AWAY OF SUPPORTING INDUSTRIES, FLYING AWAY OF INVESTMENTS OF SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE, FLYING AWAY OF DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENTS...
the difference between chennai,banglore,coimbattore still remaining and continuing with invests of telugu people and hyd situation is obvious. chennai,banglore,coimbattore has investments of telugu people from before independence. they are not residing in AP, they are natives or surrounding people and has no hate between other language people of those states. in hyd case hyd is developed exclusively by telugu people in telugu state and most of investments are shifted to hyd from madras, banglore, coimbattors after AP formation by many people as they felt it is their home place eventhough they have no problems in chennai,banglore,coimbattore. t leaders/students started movement mainly to grab this wealth, opportunities and dictate these investments/busineses in future for their development and hatred was generated towards them and projected them as thieves,goondas...in public.and alternatively vizag,vijayawada will start developing and attracting investments and assure everything whatever these investors need and investors will be having everything from industry needs point of view.
6. COMMUNAL CLASHES WILL START IN T REGION. BJP HAS STRENGTH IN T REGION AND UTILISES ITS STRENGTH TO GET POWER. MUSLIMS WHO RULED HYD STATE WILL SUFFER AS BJP SHOWS THEM AS PAST RULERS WHO OPPRESSED HINDUS AND NOW ALSO WILL SUPPRESS AND DICTATE INDIAN POLITICS ALSO IF THEY GET POWER AS MUSLIMS WILL BE IN CONSIDERABLE SIZE IN T STATE TO INFLUENCE VOTE BANK THEY WILL SUFFER INSTEAD OF GETTING FAVOURS.THEY CAN NOT LIVE PEACEFULLY.
7. REGIONAL IDEOLOGY WILL GENERATE DEMENDS FOR REGIONAL STATES THUS CHANGING POLITICS OF COUNTRY LEADING TO BACKWARDNESS.
8. QUARRELS WILL START BETWEEN T PEOPLE, SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE ON RIVER WATERS AS T LEADERS SAY THEY WANT MORE WATER TO APPEASE THEIR PEOPLE, SEEMANDHRA WONT AGREE TO SACRIFICE THEIR WATERS. SETTLERS IN T REGION ALSO SUFFERS.
9. NEGATIVE FEELING TOWARDS EACH OTHER WILL DEVELOP AND FLOURISH. AS BOTH BELIEVES THE OPPOSITE CHEATED THEM.
10. NO STRENGTH IN CENTRE. TELUGU PEOPLE CAN NOT INFLUENCE CENTRE WITH 5-10 MPs from each state after every party shares in elections.
11. Telangana people are the worst affected people. because neither their state will develop nor seemandhra people will employ or help to them, on the other hand their leaders, who are doras get free hand first time after independence to rule as per their wishes as they have none to question as they got T state by showing people's wish. so their leaders will swindle what ever they get and clashes will start among them for power.dora system, corruption, naxalism, clashes for power, mushrooming parties, little number of legislative seats resulting in horse trade and president rule/political instability providing fertile base for naxals to flourish, strengthen themselves in heart of india, hate from neighbouring seemandhra people, flyaway of industries/employment, no new industries entry, no water due to no completion of projects due to cases in tribunals/SC filed by seemandhra people, communal clashes....it will be paradise of anarchism. to day a few students are dictating all student's careers, law and order in t region, education system in universities....every stupid is supporting every stupid who ever takes t voice with them for any reason. tomorrow all of them quarrel in midst of road for power, to day they are following wrong approach and addicted to it, tomarrow same is used to get power in t state, so when t will develop, forget about development people can not live peacefully forever.

IF T FORMS WITH OUT HYD

it makes no difference whether T forms with hyd or with out hyd as hyd is surrounded by t region. any industry if wants to expand or survive must depend on surrounding t region. seemandhra leaders must develop vizag/vijayawada otherwise people will not spare them and they also can not sleep with investments in hyd with out growth. if hyd forms a UT or STATE that does not matter. these leaders should develop their respective states. t leaders can develop areas around hyd to get benefit from hyd but seemandhra can not do it, so they must lift their investments from hyd if they wants to grow peacefully and with confidence even taking some time gap. surely investments will leave hyd in any case leaving buildings in hyd. film industry gradually shifts to vizag of chennai. hyd will move back. govt of india can not dare to keep defense in hyd itself even if it is ut due to surrounding naxalism,communalism.

i will write more points later

Sunday, January 17, 2010

JYOTHI BASU, PEOPLE'S PERSON LOST PM CHAIR

JYOTHI BASU IS TRUE LEADER OF PEOPLE. HE SERVED 23 YEARS CONTINUOUSLY AS CM OF WEST BENGAL, BEFORE BECOMING CM HE SERVED AS DEPUTY CHIEF MINISTER OF WB. HE WAS SUCCESSFUL TO CHANGE WB, INFLUENCE POLITICS IN KERALA, TRIPURA AND LEFT PARTIES AND THEIR SUPPORTERS IN ALL STATES. HE LOST OPPRTUNITY TO BECOME PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA DURING UNITED DEMOCRATIC FRONT GOVERNMENT. EARSTWHILE LEADER OF CPM HARIKISHAN SINGH SURJIT REJECTED PM POST TO CPM, THUS MADE HISTORIC MISTAKE IN COMRADES HISTORY. IF BASU WAS MADE PM THEN POLITICS OF INDIA COULD HAVE WITNESSED CHANGES WITH COMMON MAN AS CENTRE AND CPM WAS ABLE TO INFLUENCE INDIAN POLICIES AND PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN, DEFENCE POLICIES WHICH THEY ARE OPPOSING FROM INDEPENDENCE. COMRADES RESTRICTED THEMSELVES TO CRITICISM OF GOVT EVEN WHEN OPPORTUNITY CAME TO THEM TO OCCUPY HIGHEST DECISION MAKING POSITION WITH HIGHEST REPUTED PERSONALITY-BASU.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS TASKS, CHALLENGES TO ASSURE UNITED AP, EQUAL RIGHTS TO ALL PEOPLE IN AP.

HURRY ATTITUDE OF KCR, T CONGRESS LEADERS, T TDP LEADERS ON TELANGANA AND THEIR ACTIVITEIS, PROPAGANDA IN THE NAME OF MOVEMENT TO ACHIVE T STATE AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES THEY DID FOR THIS BEFORE DEC.9. STATEMENT OF GOVT OF INDIA AND LOBBYING AFTER DEC.9. CREATED AND CREATING SERIOUS PROBLEMS TO SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS/PEOPLE IN ALL REGIONS OF STATE INCLUDING TELANGANA AND BECAME CHALLENGING TO THEM IN FAST CHANGING POLITICAL GAME AIDED BY MOVEMENT AS PER THE WISHES OF LEADERS. LEADERS OF PARTIES EXCEPT CHIRANJEEVI BECAME CALM IN THIS GAME.BUT AT THE SAME TIME WHAT EVER HAPPENING FROM NOV.09 HAS OPENED REAL TIME TO FIND PERMANENT SOLUTION TO ALL PROBLEMS OF STATE INCLUDING TELANGANA.
KCR RAKED UP TELANGANA ISSUE TO START BLACKMAIL POLITICS AND GET MORE FUNDS TO T REGION ON ONE HAND AND IN TRUE SIDE HE CAN EARN MUCH AND ASSURE HIS PLACE IN AP POLITICS. EVER SINCE HE STARTED T VOICE INDUSTRIES ARE NOT ENTERING IN TO AP STATE. WHAT EVER ENTERING ARE ONLY MINOR ONES. BIG PROJECTS AVOIDING STATE.GOVT OF AP IS NOT IN A POSITION TO CONVINCE INVESTORS ON FUTURE POLITICAL STATE OF STATE. AS INDUSTRIES REACHING AP BY DEPENDING MOSTLY ON LEADERS FROM SEEMANDHRA, CAPITAL FROM SEEMANDHRA, AID FROM SEEMANDHRA LEADERS/PEOPLE, RESOURCES FROM SEEMANDHRA, LOGISTICS SUPPORT FROM SEEMANDHRA AND MAN POWER, TECHNICAL KNOW HOW FROM SEEMANDHRA....BUT LOCATION IS IN T REGION-HYD. BECAUSE OF THIS REASON MANY INDUSTRIES PREFERRED VISHAKAPATNAM TO NELLORE NATIONAL HIGH WAY WHERE EVER POSSIBLE BY PASSING T REGION. WHERE EVER HYD IS THE ONLY OPTION THEY ARE LEAVING THE STATE, AP GOVT CREATED ALL WORLD CLASS INFRASTRCTURE IN HYD BUT IT IS BEING BYPASSED ON T POLITICAL NONSENSE. AP IS LOSING FROM 2001 ITSELF EVEN THOUGH GOVT IS NOT READY TO ACCEPT THIS. BABU REJECTED T ISSUE OPENLY, BUT ELECTION RESULTS OF KCR MADE ISSUE LIVE IRRSPECTIVE OF PEOPLE VOTED FOR SEPARATE STATE OR FOR PERSON ONLY OR ON THER REASONS. YSR MADE ALLIANCE WITH TRS, TRS WON MANY SEATS THUS MADE T ISSUE STRONG IRRESPECTIVE OF CONGRSS STAND ON T ISSUE IN DIPLOMATIC WORDS AND ITS STRONG LEADER ON STATE. YSR DID HIS BEST TO FORECAST TO INDUATRIES THAT AP WILL REMAIN INTACT, BUT MAJOR PROJECTS LEFT HYD INCLUDING FAB CITY, NANO ETC... IN 2009 YSR FOLLOWED DEVELOPMENT AGENDA, BUT BABU MADE ALLIANCE WITH TRS THUS MADE IT ALIVE, AFTER 2009 POLLS INDUSTRIES FELT AP WILL REMAIN INTACT DUE TO COMPLETE DEFEAT OF TRS BUT YSR DIED WITH IN THEREE MONTHS OF GOVT FORMATION. SO INDUSTRIES ARE ON BACK FOOT. FROM NOV 09 WE ARE SEEING WHAT IS HAPPENING.
TELANGANA LEADERS ARE USING T ISSUE FOR SELFISH INTERESTS FROM 1956 ITSELF. THEY GOT GO.610 ETC...TO AVOID EMPLOYMENT TO SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE IN TELANGANA, NOW CLAIMING HYD ALSO AS PART OF T REGION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE POINT OF VIEW AND CALLING FOR AGITATIONS FOR TOTAL EMPLOYMENT OF TELANGANITES IN HYD. FUNDS ARE CHANELLED TO T REGION AT THE COST OF SEEMANDHRA. AGAIN BLACK MAIL OF T LEADERS IS CONTINUING WHENEVER AND WHO EVER FEELS THEY WANT SOMETHING FOR THEIR GAIN. ALL THESE SELFISH ACTIVITIES ARE CREATING POLITICAL INSTABILITY, HECTIC POLITICS, UNDEMOCRATIC ACTIVITIES,PLAYING WITH LIVES OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, LOSS OF POPERTIES...NOW ITS TIME TO PUT PERMANENT END TO T BLACK MAIL POLITICS AND ENSURE EQUALITY OF ALL PEOPLE OF STATE IN ALL ISSUES IN THE STATE.

SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS SHOULD FIGHT FOR NOT ONLY FOR SAMIKYANDHRA BUT ALSO FOR SCRAPPING ALL DISCRIMINATORY, INJUSTICE PROVISIONS MADE SO FAR TO APPEASE T LEADERS. WHY LEGAL OPTIONS ARE LEFT ASIDE IN THIS RESPECT?, FILE PIL IN HC SEEKING BAN ON CONCEPT OF TELANGANA THALLI,DOLL,SONG AND BAN TRS AND OTHER LEADERS HATE SPEECHES AND PROVOCATIVE WORDS ON MEDIA, PUBLIC MEETINGS, FILE CASES AGAINST T LEADERS WHO EVER CALLS SEEMANDHRA LEADERS AS THIEVES/DECOITS/DEVILS AND ISTIGATES RIVALRY TOWARDS SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE. FACTS ARE SHOWING TELANGANA IS MORE DEVELOPED THAN SEEMANDHRA THEN WHY ALL DISCRIMINATORY PROVISIONS TO SUPPORT T REGION AT THE COST OF SEEMANDHRA DEVELOPMENT. SCRAP GO.610, REVENURE EXPENDITURE PROVISIONS ETC RELATED TO T REGION AND MAKE ALL STATE AS ONE UNIT.
SAMIKYANDHRA LEADERS SHOULD DEFEAT FALSE PROPAGANDA OF T LEADERS AND DEMAND FOR SCRAPPING ALL OF THOSE DISCRIMINATORY PROVISIONS AND ALSO SHIFT OF CAPITAL TO KURNOOL AS SECOND CAPITAL AND ESTABLISHMENT OF HIGH COURT BENCH IN VIJAYAWADA/GUNTUR. THESE WERE DENIED SINCE 1956 BY THE T REGION LEADERS. WHY SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS ARE NOT EXPOSING BACKWARDNESS AND CONDITIONS IN RAYALASEEMA, UTTARANDHRA AND OTHER BACKWAR DISTRICTS. T LEADERS ARE SHOWING ADILABAD, KARIMNAGAR ONLY INSTEAD OF DEVELOPED HYD,NIZAMABAD ETC...TO EVERY ONE FOR SUPPORTING T CAUSE. SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS SHOULD DEFEAT THIS FALSE CAMPAIGN.
DIPLOMACY SHOULD COME TO ACTION IN CUTTING TAILS OF T LEADERS, PUTTING PERMANENT END TO T STATE ISSUE, NO POST TO T LEADER WHO EVER VOICED T SLOGAN SO FAR IN NEAR FUTURE, SCRAPPING ALL BENEFITARY PROVISIONS OF T REGION AT THE COST OF SEEMANDHRA INTERESTS, ASSURING PEOPLE THAT NO DIVISION OF STATE FOREVER AND IT WILL NOT BE POSSIBLE IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SO NEVER BELIEVE WORDS OF ANY LEADER AND BECOME SCAPE GOATS FOR THEIR WORDS, PROVIDING SAFE SYSTEM TO ASSURE NO LOSS OF FUTURE OF SEEMANDHRA PEPLE, INVESTMENTS BY SECOND CAPITOL, BENCH OF HIGH COURT IN SEEMANDHRA AND PACKAGES FOR SEEMANDHRA FOR DEVELOPMENT. THEY SHOULD DEMAND JUSTICE FOR THE INJUSTICE DONE SO FAR TO IT BY THE T LEADERS INSTEAD OF TALKING ON T ASPECT ONLY.
SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS SHOULD FORM A SEPARATE GROUP OF LEADERS TO TAKE MEDIA REGULARLY AND EXPOSE FALSE PROPAGANDA OF T LEADERS ON ONE HAND AND ON THE OTHER HAND MAKE PEOPLE AWARE OF FACTS IN GENUINE TRUST WAY.
THEY SHOULD FORM DIFFERENT LEADERS FOR DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES- LOBBYING IN CENTRE, MOVEMENT IN SEEMANDHRA, MOVEMENT IN TELANGANA, MOVEMENT IN HYDERABAD, MOVEMENT WITH STUDENTS AND OTHER ORGANISATIONS AND MEDIA WING. MEDIA SHOULD EXPOSE EVERY SINGLE WRONG ACT OF T LEADERS ON T ISSUE AND THEIR PROVOCATIONS TO THE PUBLIC AND IMPACT OVER PUBLIC DUE TO THESE PROVOCATIONS AND ALSO REAL INTENTIONS OF T LEADERS,THEY SHOULD PLAY KEY ROLE MASS SWIFT OF OPINION OF PEOPLE FROM T VOICE TO SAMAIKYANDHRA VOICE.

samaikyandhra leaders should give due care to defeat separatism permanently. they should not offer any single post irrespective of its importance in decision making to separatist leaders. giving any post in govt or party to separatists means keeping t issue live forever. t leaders/people should come to conclusion that telangana is not possible and telangana name is not possible to use for black mail politics and they will lose if they use t name or any separatism format. this can be done now as t region is developed in all aspects with projects completion and there is no single valid reason from t leaders to form t state. what ever needed is strong leadership, diplomacy from seemandhra leaders to defeat separatist leaders permanently and any one taking this responsibility as leader. at the same time if situation is must to offer post means they should be given to samaikyandhra supporting leaders with in hyd or t region.this will permanently discourage t voice again as they dont get anything instead they will lose and also ensures future nil support to t voice as leaders follow wait and watch approach so that they will get posts and those who went forward will lose. in TDP talasani and many others about 90% are united andhra leaders. in congress konda family from warangal is strong supporter of united ap. all leaders in hyd, khammam districts are in favour of united ap only and there is there are many leaders who are sitting quitely and watching, waiting for their time to show their strength.they should get jobs.

I WILL WRITE MORE POINTS LATER

WHY TELANGANA LEADERS PARTICULARLY KCR WANT TELANGANA IMMEDIATELY OFFICIALLY

NO ONE FELT THAT YSR WILL DIE SUDDENLY WHEN HE IS AT HELM OF AFFAIRS IN STATE, CENTRAL POLITICS. YSR MADE TRS A STUPID BANKRUPT PARTY, DIVIDED IT IN TO PIECES, MADE STRONG OPPOSITION TO KCR WITH IN TRS, UNPOPULARISED KCR,TRS IN PEOPLE...MADE KCR TO HIDE IN HOUSE FOR MONTHS...KCR CAN NOT DARE TO ACT OR PLAN AGAINST YSR AND WIN OVER HIM AS HE WON PEOPLE AND TOUGH IN HIS STAND ON ANY ISSUE AND EXCELS IN DIPLOMACY. HIS DEATH GAVE POLITICAL LIFE HOPES TO KCR AND TRS PARTY. BUT YSR HAS STRONG SUCCESSOR IN THE FORM OF JAGAN, HE HAS EQUAL POPULARITY IN PEOPLE. IF JAGAN HEADS STATE OF STATE CONGRESS THEN KCR WILL BE IN TROUBLE. AS HE ACCELERATE YSR POLICIES AND ENSURES TIMELY COMPLETION OF PROJECTS AND INTRODUCES MORE POLICIES TO WIN PEOPLE. BUT FORTUNATE TO KCR, SONIA DID NOT MADE JAGAN NEITHER CM NOR PCC PRESIDENT IMMEDIATELY AND PUT VETERAN ROSSAIAH ON CM CHAIR, WHO HAS NO SUPPORT FROM PEOPLE/PARTY MEMBERS/MLAs/MPs/and MINISTERS.
BUT OPTIONS OF JAGAN ASSUMING CHARGE OF STATE PCC OR BECOMING CM ARE IN NEAR DISTANCE BEFORE 2014 ELECTIONS. THEN HIS POPULARITY ALONG WITH BABU,CHIRU WILL DEFEAT TRS WITH NO DEPOSITS.
THE TRS,KCR DEMANDING SEPARATE STATE OF TELANGANA ON UNDER DEVELOPMENT BASIS. BUT IT IS MORE DEVELOPED THAN OTHER REGIONS INDUSTRIALLY. IRRIGATION WATER IS IN PROBLEM COMPARED TO COASTA.IN ALL OTHER ASPECTS TELANGANA IS SIMILAR TO REST OF AP/INDIA. YSR STARTED JALAYAGNAM TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION WATER TO ALL PARTS OF STATE AND ALLOCATED MORE MONEY TO TELANGANA DISTRICTS AS IT IS A PLATEAU REGION AND NEEDS MORE MONEY, TECHNOLOGY TO PROVIDE WATER TO CROPS.SO WATER PROBLEM IS SOLVED. YSR STARTED LOT OF WELFARE SCHEMES TO WIN ALL SECTIONS OF PEOPLE IN SOCIETY ALL OVER THE STATE AS PROBLEMS ARE SAME EVERY WHERE.SO WELFARE POINT IS SOLVED. SO TRS CAN NOT TALK ABOUT UNDER DEVELOPMENT. BUT THEY WANT SEPARATE STATE DUE TO REASONS WHICH I HAVE SAID IN OTHER ARTICLES. SO IT COINED SELF RESPECT OR SELF RULE CONCEPT. SELF RULE MEANS RULING OUR SELVES. TELANGANA MINISTERS ARE THERE IN EVERY MINISTRY FROM 1956 AND HELD, HOLDING KEY PORT FOLIOS, CM MAY BE FROM ANY REGION AS CM POST IS ONLY ONE, BUT MINISTERS WERE FROM ALL REGIONS TO REPRESENT MINISTRY/GOVT ALL PARTS OF STATE. SO THEY ARE NOT RULED BY OUT SIDERS. IN T LEADERS VIEW SELF RESPECT MEANS TELANGANA PERSON SHOULD BE CM. WHEN PV, VENGAL RAO...ARE CHIEF MINISTERS THEN SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE DID NOT RAISE SELF RESPECT ISSUE.WHEN JAI ANDHRA MOVEMENT TOOK PLACE PV WAS THE CM, EVEN THAT TIME ANDHRA PEOPLE DID NOT ASK CM POST. SO SELF RESPECT ISSUE IS ONLY NONSENSE REASON. IF SELF RESPECT IS THE BASE THEN INDIA HAS TO BE DIVIDED IN TO THOUSANDS OF STATE AS EVERY RELIGION, LANGUAGE, RACE, SUB REGION, DISTRICT, REVENUE DIVISION,SOCIO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES...DEMAND SELF RESPECT.THEN INDIA WILL BE HAVING THOUSANDS OF CHIEF MINISTERS. A CHIEF MINISTER FOR MORE OR LESS ONE LAKH POPULATION. NOTH EAST INDIA WILL BECOME HUNDREDS OF STATE AS EVERY TRIBE THERE HAS SELF RESPECT , READY TO KILL OR DIE FOR THAT SELF RESPECT.
KCR FELT WHAT EVER MAY BE BY 2014 ALL IRRIGATION PROJECTS WILL BE COMPLETED, THEN PEOPLE DONT CARE NEW STATE DEMAND DUE TO WATER AVAILABILITY, WELFARE SCHEMES, INDUSTRIES, HYDERABAD...RESULT IN MAKING TELANGANA AS A ROLE MODEL IN DEVELOPMENT. HE CAN NOT DARE AGAINST YSR, FORTUNATELY HE DIED FROM KCR VIEW POINT, SO HE FELT ITS RIGHT TIME TO GET T STATE ON PAPER SO THAT BY 2014 T STATE IS CARVED OUT AND PRIJECTS ALSO WILL BE COMPLETED. BY THE TIME OF T STATE FORMATION IT WILL BE WITH INDUSTRIES, IRRIGATION WATER, WELFARE SCHEMES, WORLD CLASS CITY-HYD...MAKING TELANGANA AS A DEVELOPED STATE.HE CAN SAY HE OR T LEADERS DEVELOPED WITH IN MONTHS AS DEVELOPED TELANGANA.
BUT IF JAGAN COMES TO POWER BEFORE 2014 EITHER AS CM OR PCC HEAD THEN HE CAN NOT PROCEED TO DO HIS BLACKMAILING TACTICS. ROSSAIAH IS WEAK SO CAN DO IT NOW. IF T STATE IS NOT FORMED IN PAPER NOW THEN IT CAN NOT BE FORMED FOREVER AND HE WILL NOT BECOME POLITICAL HEAD OR EARN MUCH FOREVER DUE TO DEVELOPMENT OF STATE ALONG WITH TELANGANA AS MOST DEVELOPED REGION BY 2014 AND JAGAN AT THE HELM OF CONGRESS AFFAIRS, BABU IN TDP AND BALA KRISHNA AS ITS SECOND, CHIRU GETTING STRENGTH, LOK SATTA DOING ITS WORK ALL WILL ELIMINATE KCR FROM POLITICS.
BECAUSE OF THESE REASONS KCR WENT ON FAKE FAST UTILISING ROSSAIAH'S WEAKNESS IN ADMINISTRATION,POLITICS/DIPLOMACY, TOUGH STAND.
CONGRESS LEADERS IN TELANGANA SUPPORTED KCR, BECAUSE THEY WANT CM CHAIR, DEVELOPED T REGION WILL BE CARVED OUT FROM AP OPENING PLENTY OF OPTIONS TO THEM FOR BUSINESS, POWER IN GOVT AND ELIMINSTES COMPETITION FROM SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE/LEADERS. MORE OVER THEY CAN NOT BECOME CM AS LONG AS JAGAN OR OTHER POWERFUL LEADER FROM SEEMANDHRA COMPETES WITH THEM. THEY FELT ITS RIGHT TIME DUE TO YSR DEATH, JAGAN ROLE IN QUESTION MARK AND OTHER FACTORS AS I SAID ABOVE.

IN REALITY THEY WANT TO CARVE OUT WELL DEVELOPED REGION OF STATE BY 2014 ON UNDER DEVELOPMENT BASIS AND CREDIT THEMSELVES FOR DEVELOPMENT FRUITS TO THE PEOPLE OF TELANGANA WHICH WILL BE AVAILABLE WITH IN ONE OR ONE AND HALF YEAR AFTER T FORMATION AS PER PROJECT TIME COMPLETION, EVEN IF THEY ARE COMPLETED WELL BEFORE 2014 T STATE IS ON FORMATION DUE TO START OF STATE FORMATION SO SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE CAN NOT INFLUENCE DECISIONS OF PEOPLE.
T MOVEMENT IS BASED ON SHALLOW ISSUE,SENTIMENT AND LIES,PROVOCATIONS. IF THERE IS TIME TO PEOPLE TO THINK THEN THEY WILL KNOW FACTS, SEEMANDHRA LEADERS, SAMAIKYANDHRA LEADERS WITH IN TELANGANA PROVIDE ALL TRUTH TO THE PEOPLE AND MAJORITY VOICE BOTH WITH IN, OUT SIDE STATE WILL BE FOR TRUTH I.E.UNITED AP. ONCE T PEOPLE THINKS THEN THEY DONT SUPPORT T VOICE, ALREADY WHATEVER SUPPORT T LEADERS ARE GETTING IS MINIMUM.ALL THOSE WHO DID MOVEMENT IN FIRST ROUND ARE DOING REPEATEDLY, NO ADDITIONAL PERSON ADDED TO THE MOVEMENT.IF PEOPLE WILL KNOW TRUTH THEN THEY WILL REJECT T LEADERS IN PERMANENCE-POSISIBILITIES WILL BE MAXIMUM, THERE WILL BE NO SUPPORT TO T VOICE ON ONE HAND ON OTHER HAND UNITED AP LEADERS IN T REGION WHO EVER KEEPING MUM NOW WILL GET VOICE IN T REGION ALONG WITH UNITED AP LEADERS FROM ENTIRE COUNTRY, IT WILL BE OVERWHELMING AND DEFEATS T VOICE PERMANENTLY AND BURIES IT. SO T LEADERS WANT TASK SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN HEAT ITSELF THATS WHY THEY ARE NOT LOSING SINGLE OPPORTUNITY.OK

CONCEPT OF UNITED AP- TELANGANA ; CONTRAST

UNITED FAMILY MEANS POOLING OF ALL RESOURCES AND UTILISING THEM IN A PLANNED WAY TO BENEFIT EVERY ONE AT THE SAME TIME MEETING ALL NEEDS OF EVERY ONE IN THE FAMILY TO PREVENT ITS DEPENDENCE ON OTHER FAMILY OR FAMILIES.
UNITED AP CONCEPT IS POOLING OF RESOURCES OF ANDHRA STATE, TELANGANA DISTRICTS OF HYDERABAD STATE AND UTILISING THEM TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALL PEOPLE OF STATE. HOW EVER PEOPLE OF TELANGANA DISTRICTS WERE MORE BACKWARD THAN ANDHRA STATE PEOPLE AT THE TIME OF AP FORMATION FOR THIS REASON CAPITAL WAS SHIFTED TO HYDERABAD FROM KURNOOL TO PUSH DEVELOPMENT OF TELANGANA DISTRICTS RAPIDLY SO THAT IT CAN CATCH ANDHRA DISTRICTS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE.
IF THERE IS ANY POINT SPECIFIC TO TELANGANA DISTRICTS DURING FORMATION OF AP IT WAS ONLY TO PROVIDE PUSH FACTOR TO FAR BACKWARD TELANGANA DISTRICTS BUT NOT FOR OBSTRUCTING DEVELOPMENT OF SEEMANDHRA DISTRICTS AND KEEP DEVELOPMENT ONLY TO TELANGANA.
IF ANY STATE SPENDS ALL REVENUES GENERATED IN AN AREA IN THAT AREA ONLY THEN WHY THERE SHOULD BE STATE? WHY THERE IS NEED FOR UNITEDNESS? HOW POOLING OF RESOURCES OCCURS? HOW DEVELOPMENT OF ALL PEOPLE WILL TAKE PLACE? HOW IT IS CALLED AS UNITED STATE?
IF HYD IS LEFT TO T REGION, MADE UNION TERRITORY, THEN WHO WILL LOSE. ITS SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE. THEY PUT THEIR BLOOD TO BUILD HYD FROM LAST 55 YEARS AND HAS NO PROPERTY OTHER THAN HYD, NOW TELANGANA LEADERS WANT BOTH HYD AND ITS REVENUE AND ITS FUTURE, THUS PUTS SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE ON ROAD WITH EMPTY HANDS. THESE PEOPLE HAVE TO COME AGAIN TO SEEMANDHRA AND START FROM FIRST IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT PATH. CENTRE MAY PROVIDE GRANT BUT IT CAN NOT PROVIDE 55 YEARS HARD EARNED BASE. SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE IN SIMPLE WORDS WILL START THEIR DEVELOPMENT FROM 1956. WHEN ALL OTHERS IN COUNTRY ARE IN 2010.
TELANGANA LEADERS SAY ALL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN TELANGANA SHOULD BE GIVEN TO TELANGANA PEOPLE ONLY AS PER G.O.610 WHICH WAS A RESULT OF CHENNA REDDY AGITATION. IF ALL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN TELANGANA ARE FOR TELANGANA PEOPLE ONLY THEN WHAT ABOUT SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE. EVEN IF THEY HAVE TALENT THEY SHOULD LOSE EMPLOYMENT OPPRTUNITY. DUE TO BACKWARDNESS OF TELANGANA AT THE TIME OF AP FORMATION EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN TELANGANA CAN BE RESERVED FOR TELANGANA PEOPLE UP TO A REASONABLE RATIO OF TOTAL JOBS AND UP TO CERTAIN TIME LIMIT SAY 20-30 YEARS. IT IS REASONABLE .AFTER THAT EVERY ONE IS EQUAL IN STATE IN ALL ASPECTS.
TELANGANA LEADERS SAY HYDERABAD IS IN TELANGANA SO JOBS IN HYDERABAD SHOULD BELONG TO ONLY TELANGANA PEOPLE.HYD IS COLLECTIVE PROPERTY AS PER GENTLEMEN AGREEMENT.HYD IS A CAPITAL. IN CAPITAL EVERY PERSON OF STATE WILL HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ARE CREATED IN HYD ONLY IN AP DUE TO ALL GOVT HEAD QUARTERS, BIG SIZE OF CITY, INDUSTRIES...IF ALL THESE JOBS ARE LEFT TO TELANGANA PEOPLE THEN WHAT IS LEFT FOR SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE.-ASH.

IN TELANGANA LEADERS POINT OF VIEW UNITED ANDHRA MEANS ALL REVENUES GENERATED IN TELANGANA REGION INCLUDING HYDERABAD SHOULD BE SPENT IN TELANGANA ONLY. ALL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN TELANGANA INCLUDING IN HYDERABAD SHOULD BE FOR TELANGANA PEOPLE ONLY. DEVELOPMENT OF TELANGANA REGION INCLUDING HYDERABAD IS TO BE DONE WITH MONEY FROM BOTH TELANGANA,SEEMANDHRA REGIONS. CHIEF MINISTER SHOULD BE FROM TELANGANA.TELANGANA PEOPLE CAN DO JOB IN SEEMANDHRA,TELANGANA, BUT SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE CAN NOT DO JOB IN TELANGANA. SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE CAN NOT OWN LAND IN TELANGANA AND DO BUSINESS IN TALNGANA INCLUDING HYDERABAD, BUT TELANGANA PEOPLE CAN ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN SEEMANDHRA AND DO BUSINESS IN SEEMANDHRA. LOOK HOW JUSTIFIED " MANOBHAVALU" OF TELANGANA PEOPLE/LEADERS.
TELANGANA LEADERS SAY IF YOU WANT TO BE UNITED THEN DEVELOP ONLY TELANGANA REGION-HYD, PUT YOUR INVESTMENTS HERE, DONT COMPETE WITH TELANGANA CONTRACTORS/INVESTORS, MAKE TELANGANA LEADER AS CHIEF MINISTER EVERY TIME. IN SIMPLE WORDS " EMPTY YOUR HOUSE, COME TO TELANGANA/HYD, INVEST HERE, LISTEN WHAT TELANGANA CONTRACTORS/LEADERS SAY, PAY TAX TO TELANGANA DEVELOPMENT, EMPLOY TELANGANA PEOPLE, VOTE FOR TELANGANA LEADER, FOLLOW TELANGANA LEADER MADE LAWS AND FORGET YOUR BITH PLACE,ITS DEVELOPMENT AND THOSE DEPENDED ON YOU AND LIVE IN HYD/TELANGANA AS A SLAVE TO DEVELOP TELANGANA/HYD WITH NO RIGHT TO SPEAK, NO RIGHT TO SECURITY TO YOUR LIFE/PROPERTY/BUSINESS.""IDI TELANGANA PRAJALA MANOBHAVALU , GUNDE CHAPPUDU"

Friday, January 15, 2010

FACTS ON TELANGANA

1. BY 1953 ANDHRA STATE WAS WITH TAMIL NADU AS MADRAS STATE, MADRAS STATE WAS IN BRITISH INDIA AS PROVINCE WITH PRESENT TAMIL NADU, RAYALASEEMA( 4 DISTRICTS, WHICH WERE PART OF DECCAN STATE OF HYDERABAD, NIZAM GAVE THEM TO BRITISH INDIA AS PART OF AGREEMENT), AND COASTAL DISTRICTS OF AP, WHICH WERE CALLED SARKAR - EXCLUDING PRAKASAM,NELLORE- AND WERE GIVEN TO BRITISH BY NIZAM.
HYDERABAD STATE WAS WITH PRESENT TELANGANA DISTRICTS, NORTH KARNATAKA DISTRICTS, MARATHI SPEAKING DISTRICTS IN MH ADJOINING AP IN NORTH.

2. DEVELOPMENT IN SEEMANDHRA WAS WITH BRITISH INDIA TILL 1947, DEVELOPMENT IN HYDERABAD STATE WAS WITH NIZAM TILL ITS ABSORPTION IN TO INDIA. PROJECTS WAS BUILT ACROSS GODAVARI, KRISHNA BY BRITISHERS TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION WATER TO COASTAL DISTRICTS TO ERADICATE FAMINE, CONTROL FLOODS- DHAVALESWARAM ETC..., PLAIN AREAS NEED SMALL INVESTMENTS TO DEVELOP. NIZAM PAID TAX TO THE BRITISH GOVT BUT DID NOT TOOK ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY IN HIS STATE EXCEPT FOR MEETING HIS NEEDS.
BY INDEPENDENCE PEOPLE IN HYDERABAD STATE WERE POOREST OF POOR IN INDIA AN RELATIVELY MORE POOR THAN SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE WHILE SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE ITSELF POOR.

3. EDUCATION WAS LOWEST IN SEEMANDHRA, BUT IN HYDERABAD STATE IT WAS NIL IN REALITY.

4. ZAMINDARI SYSTEM/LAND LORD SYSTEM WAS ABOLISHED AFTER INDEPENDENCE IN INDIA. BUT IT WAS SO STRONG IN TELANGANA DISTRICTS THAT EVEN TODAY IT IS VISIBLE. THE NUMBER OF ACRES LAND HELD BY TELANGANA ZAMINDARS/REDDYS ARE HUGE COMPARED TO ZAMINDARS IN SEEMANDHRA. WITH GOVT OF INDIA LEGISLATION BANNING ZAMINDARI SYSTEM ITS IMPACT WAS HUGE ON SEEMANDHRA BUT MEAGRE IN TELANGANA DISTRICTS DUE TO ITS STRONG PRESENCE AND IGNORANT PEOPLE.

5. PEOPLE OF SEEMANDHRA WERE PARTICIPATED IN FREEDOM MOVEMENT, MORE MOVEMENTS AROSE IN THIS REGION. THE FACTORS OF ENLIGHTENMENT, UNITY ARE DEEP ROOTED. PEOPLE OF TELANGANA DISTRICTS HAD NO NEED TO FIGHT AGAINST BRITISH, THEY FOUGHT AGAINST NIZAM OPPRESSIVE RULE OCCASSIONALLY AND TOOK HELP OF NEIGHBOURING TELUGU PEOPLE IN SEEMANDHRA BUT AWARENESS LEVELS ARE AT VERY LOW LEVEL AND UNITY FACTOR IS ALSO LOW DUE TO NIZAM POLICIES, MULTI LANGUAGES ETC...

6. IN 1953 ANDHRA STATE WAS FORMED WITH THE AIM OF KEEPING ALL TELUGU PEOPLE UNITED AND A SINGLE STATE FOR TELUGU PEOPLE. BUT TELANGANA PEOPLE ARE NOT SINGLE IN HYDERABAD STATE THEY ARE WITH KANNADA, MARATHI PEOPLE ALONG WITH HUGE MUSLIM POPULATION WITH IN TELANGANA. BUT TO KEEP ALL TELUGU PEOPLE UNITED FREEDOM FIGHTERS OF THOSE DAYS BURGULA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, BEJAWADA GOPAL REDDY ETC... FELT NEED TO UNITE TELUGU PEOPLE IN HYDERABAD STATE WITH ANDHRA STATE SO THAT ALL TELUGU PEOPLE WILL BE UNITED IN A SINGLE STAE AS KANNADA, MARATHI SPEAKING PEOPLE WILL JOIN MYSORE, BOMBAY STATES, IT WILL BE BENEFICIAL TO ALL PEOPLE. MOVEMENT AROSE FOR THIS AS - VISHALANDHRA-, FAZL ALI COMMISSION OF GOVT OF INDIA PRAFERED VISHALANDHRA AND SPECIFIED A ROUTE FOR IT TO SEEK PEOPLE MANDATE ON MERGER, LEADERS MERGED TELANGANA REGION WITH ANDHRA STATE. AN AGREEMENT CALLED GENTLE MEN AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED IN THIS RESPECT MAKING CAPITAL HYDERABAD AS COLLECTIVE PROPERTY.

7. CAPITAL WAS SHIFTED TO HYDERABAD FROM KURNOOL, HIGH COURT TO HYDERABAD FROM GUNTUR. THE REASONS BEHIND THIS ARE, TO CUSHION DEVELOPMENT IN FAR BACKWARD TELANGANA DISTRICTS AS CAPITAL WILL SERVE AS GROWTH CENTRE. IF CAPITAL LIES IN SEEMANDHRA THEN LEADERS FELT IT MAY NOT HELP IN DEVELOPMENT OF TELANGANA DISTRICTS. MORE OVER THE MONEY ALLOCATED FOR CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION ETC...WILL BE SAVED BY USING NIZAM BUILDINGS OF GOVT OF INDIA.

8. THE CONGRESS RULED AP STATE FROM 1956 TO 1985, THEN FROM 1991-96,2004- NOW, TDP RULED FROM 1985-91,1996-2004. ON THE WHOLE CONGRESS IS THE RULER OF STATE. POWER POLITICS IN CONGRESS RESULTED IN USE OF REGIONAL LINES IN 1969 BY CHENNA REDDY LEADING TO CHIEF MINISTERSHIP. AFTER THAT NONE THOUGHT OF REGIONAL ISSUE TILL KCR RAISED IT DUE TO NO MINISTRY IN BABU PERIOD- SECOND TERM-, IN FIRST TERM HE SERVED AS TRANSPORT MINISTER, IN SECOND TERM HE GOT DEPUTY SPEAKER POST-RESPONSIBLEPOST.

9. LAND LORDS IN TELANGANA DISTRICTS DID NOT ALLOW CONGRESS GOVT IN STATE IRRESPECTIVE OF WHO EVER ON CM CHAIR TO ABANDON DORA SYSTEM AND IMPLEMENT LAND REFORMS STRICTLY. BY IT RESULTED IN GROWTH OF NAXALISM ONES IT ENTERED IN TO INDIA IN TELANGANA DISTRICTS. NAXALS OBSTRUCTED DEVELOPMENT AFTER LAND LORDS.LAND LORDS CONFINED THEMSELVES TO HYDERABAD FROM THE TIME OF NAXALS OUT BREAK TO RECENT TIMES DUE TO FEAR OF LIFE.

10. ALL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN AP TOOK PLACE IN TELANGANA REGION WITH HYDERABAD ACTING AS CENTRE OF DEVELOPMENT FOR TELANGANA, RAYALASEEMA, COASTAL DISTRICTS. AND IT IS WORLD CLASS CITY TODAY.TELANGANA PEOPLE BENEFITTED MOST FROM HYD DEVELOPMENT THAN OTHER PEOPLE. LAND LORDS GOT MONEY IN THOUSANDS OF CRORES FROM THEIR BARREN LANDS WHICH ARE IN THE FAKE NAME OF POOR FARMENRS.

11. DEVELOPMENT IS TAKING PLACE RAPIDLY IN INDIA FROM 1995 ONLY IN ALL PARTS OF INDIA. BEFORE THAT WE ARE POOR IN ALL ISSUES-MONEY,TECHNOLOGY,MAN POWER...
12. COMPARED TO SEEMANDHRA ,TELENGANAIS RELATIVELY MORE DEVELOPED AND MORE DEVELOPMENTS PROJECTS ARE ON PIPELINE. EVENTHOUGH IT IS PLATEAU HINDERING DEVELOPMENT.
13. NAXALS WERE CONTROLLED ONLY BY THE YEAR 1999 OR 2000 SO THAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES CAN START IN T REGION.
14. T REGION IS DEVELOPED INDUSTRIALLY WITH SECONDARY, TERTIARY SECTORS ARE IN STRONG POSITION. IRRIGATION WATER IS SHORT COMPARED TO COASTA BUT FAR BETTER THAN RAYALASEEMA. DUE TO JALAYAGNAM IRRIGATION WATER WILL BE AVAILABLE TO T REGION. SO T REGION IS DEVELOPED IN ALL SECTORS BY NEXT 5 YEARS ONCE PROJECTS COMPLETED. ON THE CONTRARY COASTA HAS NO INDUSTRIES, ONLY A LIMITED INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT TOOK PLACE IN SECONDARY SECTOR, TERTIARY SECTOR HAS NO PLACE. WATER IS NOT AVAILABLE TO MOST OF LAND , IN NORTH ANDHRA NO WATER IS AVAILABLE FOR IRRIGATION.SO COASTA HAS NEITHER PRIMARY NOR SECONDARY,TERTIARY SECTOR DEVELOPED TO THE REASONABLE LEVEL. RAYALASEEMA HAS NEITHER WATER NOR INDUSTRIES OF ANY TYPE-SECONDARY, TERTIARY IN ITS PLACE.PEOPLE ARE LOOKING FOR WATER FROM JALAYAGNAM FORGET ABOUT INDUSTRY.

15. NOW T LEADERS WANT CONTROL OVER RICH HARVEST CREATED WITH COLLECTIVE MONEY IN T REGION, BY DIVIDING IT FROM AP, HAVING COMPLETE CONTROL OVER HYD BUSINESS AND REAP FRUITS OF DEVELOPMENT TO T LEADERS ONLY BY DENYING OPPORTUNITIES TO SEEMANDHRA PEOPLE/LEADERS AND THROWING THEM AWAY FROM T REGION. THEY DID NOT ASK TELANGANA TILL 2001 I.E.WELL DEVELOPMENT OF HYD, WHEN HYD GROW BEYOND ALL EXPECTATIONS THEY FIND ITS THEIR TURN NOW.

I WILL WRITE MORE POINTS LATER