AP can not be bifurcated or divided. Telangana is only a political game used by some politicians for their survival and parties for votes, but none will allow solution to T issue as they will lose profit, survival once T issue is solved, there is no T issue , it is only created issue and no solution lies to it except political gain.parties in state, centre will do their best to prevent division of state.-before dec.9
centre govt dictated by sonia took dec.9 decision in either one of my views.1. Divide AP , thus weaken JAGAN, BABU and their commanding role in centre politics as already YSR proved what he is. 2. Defeat, eliminate Telangana issue permanently in AP politics with top to bottom approach. sonia followed first view feeling she is commander of congress in AP, but fumbled due to samaikyandhra movement,lost credibility in people, congress leaders with in state from seemandhra who are powerful leaders, capitalists.damage control activities were started with dec.23 statement, committee appointment... but where she stands is suspicious.she under estimated seemandhra leaders, jagan, babu thus paid price for it with congress losing credibility in people, thus sonia her self ruined congress in ap.committee is only for finding reasons to get some support to sonia's next decision. whether it is division or elimination of separation is known to sonia and her team.but politicians in both sides will not keep quite to accept her decision what ever it may be. she instigated, aggravated separatists then put committee to discus, now she is in trouble due to cent percent wrong dec.9 decision. lets see what she will do, whether she appoints powerful person as CM and eliminates separatism or works under rosaiah leadership by making him powerful to eliminate separatists or continues with rosaiah by not allowing him to use powers thus making him only a rubber stamp thus making separatists strong and divide AP.division means problems, blood bath.united ap means defeat, elimination of separatists politically and force on undemocratic forces in T region. what she prefers? we will find answer in one or two weeks.
second view carries weight because of no real support to T issue from parties on ground,but dec.9 statement made knowing this reality. whether sonia did not know ground reality or sonia knew ground reality but took dec.9 decision according to first view as seemandhra congress leaders left decision to her and she is the boss of congress, already she appointed rosaiah as cm against wishes of all congress leaders, cadre in ap but they accepted now division also gets accepted irrespective of their wish. if she gave value to ground reality then second view.i.e eliminating T issue in ap politics permanently is the cause for dec.9 decision, if she gave no value to ground reality then first view is right. here dec.9 statement is wrong and most risky one even she gave value to ground reality as it strengthens separatists, but it was made this shows first view carries more weight behind dec.9 decision but it failed.
creating a big problem to overcome a problem of considerable size is also a strategy. kcr fast drama, some sort of movement aiding it created problem to congress votes, so create big problem and confusion thus make people forget about kcr, put congress votes intact, divert people from trs...solve or not solve problem is second one. solution is not easy. now kcr is in ashes, trs can not win any seat now.now tdp,congress will decide.only these two can solve problem, others only create problem.
i strongly favours no division plan from sonia due to on going activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment