Committee! for what?

congress high command- not govt of india- formed committee for consultations. irrespective of its terms of reference what is the intention behind forming committee and report content getting from committee.committee is a tool to justify one's actions by siting committee findings/recommendations/advises as genuine ones.may be possible reasons behind forming committee

1. To buy time to defeat, eliminate separatism politically.- committee will submit report for united ap and sites reasons for it and submits in appropriate time that will help politically.

2. To justify division plans with reasons- committee will justify division and site reasons for it and submit report in needed time.

3. To declare Hyd is not part of Telangana even if T happens or T demand comes to surface in future- committee will recommend united state,recommend hyd is collective property and can not be part of T region if separation happens.- it will check separation demand in future as people, leaders can not claim on hyd even if they raise separation.now all movement is for hyd, if parties say hyd is not part of t region then they will lose, but if it comes from committee then every one will accept.

4. To solve regionalism problem permanently by getting suggestions from committee and making amendments to the constitution to defeat regionalism and associated politics with it by taking t issue as an example or starting point.

5. Solving all problems in state politically and solve go.610, free zone...problems and making all equal. and providing facts to the people on which separatists claiming separate state, thus defeating separatists on one hand and solving political, administrative problems on other hand by siting committee report.

6. buying time to solve separation, unionist problem politically and then smashing committee by siting no need of committee as problem is solved.

goals may be mixed

sri krishna committee has no planning commission member, no historian, no politician...to interpret things in genuine way and do right judgement. planning commission member knows importance of every project and the goal behind it and causes of each project/plan/policy in preparing , implementing in certain area.

ultimately committee serves congress high command interests whether it is separation agenda or unionist agenda, so chances could not be taken, thats why committee should be rejected.thus its validity and its recommendations will not be binding on unionists if it recommends separation, but if it recommends uninism then acceptance or reject does not matter.

one thing is certain and must for congress high command.it must put end to t issue well before 2014 elections. till 2009 there was no party with clear cut stand on united ap, people depended, trusted their leaders in parties, but t issue was sole agenda of trs and others, now situation changed, prp took clear cut stand on united ap, Rayalaseema party with clear cut stand on united AP may emerge, and present critical political situation forced people to ask or vote for only that party which exclusively guarantees united AP.. counter emerged to the trs in seemandhra region, hyd and united ap seeking constituencies in t region. as long as there was no party on clear stand on united ap issue parties-cong,tdp or others can play with t issue, but now they have no option as present situation proved to the people that they should not trust any leader and go for single point party. double speak will benefit prp,trs. single word policy must, but it can not be taken unless problem is solved, for tdp its second as it is not in power and has no authority to solve it, but for cong it is must.so congress has to solve it and that too keeping people, business...national interest in mind. tdp likes this as it has no responsibility except putting cong in problems , committee will not solve problem, committee will aid to solve problem, even if committee recommends 100% for t state or united ap that can not be welcome unless politics changes and favours single decision. it is the crux of this issue. can cong win politics? already it is running indirect/direct governor rule by putting security expert as governor so that it could end movement in t region with iron hand, once movement ends in nay form then political action starts.lets see

here point is separatists asking committee on separation issue only, they are saying separation is justifiable and siting various reasons for it, if these reasons are justifiable and carries validity to form separate state then why they fear about committee in holistic sense.this shows separation has no valid reasons.