AS I SAID EARLIER

I said in fore articles about what is going on in Delhi on AP issue and in AP on crisis issue. matching my predictions committee was formed with no telangana word, and resignations are controlled by congress. TDP followed congress. TRS became scape goat. now congress, tdp will decide what will be the future, TRS will sit in home. BJP foolishly opened door for DS to enter in to Assembly by resigning its seat- nizamabad where DS lost election-. DS entry in to house will make congress problem easy as he can be trusted by both sides and crucial posts can be offered to him including deputy chief minister or chief minister if possible with out deputy chief minister till 2013 so that jagan could enter secretariat before elections to ensure party win in 2014 elections.

TRS which is nothing but nonsense in assembly foolishly left house thus made congress job, tdp job comfortable. speaker strategically put end to nonsense trs.tdp legislator who resigned may be out of tdp. those congress leaders who are sticky to resignations will lose political career in congress.

committee is boycotted by trs due to fear of negative result as its demand has no validity.and decided to stay out of house, committee to create nonsense, influence parties with its activities, but solution will come other way and most possibly for united ap only. trs has no role in positive or negative result on t issue, congress tactically threw trs in to ashes, tdp worked well in this game.trs strategy got severe jolt right from first day with police taking lathi in to hand every where. now they will treat lessons to trs cadre, students who ever forces others,promotes enemity...all tactics of trs. thus kcr himself should search for his safety forget about others. his party men will become against to him due to resignations with in 6 months after winning, stiff contest from congress,tdp in elections as now every one is championing t cause on screen and tickets issue. so trs will be in ashes soon.

for congress reality surfaced after its foolish dec.9 decision. if still it is going with dec.9 approach then it will be no more in india politics surely, it must use committee as a time buying tool on one hand and defeating separatism tool on other hand with no separation conclusion from committee. already RRS formed showing no future to congress in present ap politics,prp took united ap stand and tdp is united ap party in reality,and babu will be crucial in centre from state or directly from centre due to present dirty congress game, jagan did not lose single vote or his supporting leader in t region even during crisis and they are with him. congress has to decide what to do?

DECISION-DEMOCRACY-MOVEMENT

T movement is artificial, it was created by KCR during his fasting with money, provocation and lies. but centre took dec.9 decision siting genuineness of movement when every one in common public knows that it was not genuine movement and has no people support. centre rubbed dec.9 decision on T people forcefully. in democracy decisions are made by people, but it has its limits. in any angle dec.9 decision is wrong from people point of view, from nation point of view.seeing foolishness of dec.9 statement everywhere in country movements started for separate states, they are also eligible in fact some of them are genuine movements and has credibility to become states, but they were refused why? when T fake movement resulted in dec.9 statement , then why not others? only centre could answer for this, they are giving all nonsense reasons for this. thus centre itself dividing india and dividing people of india and creating clashes between people of india. centre is no more. chidambaram is unfit to be home minister of india along with present decision makers in delhi both with in , out side govt. they dont know ground realities with in india, in a state then how can they run country? its blot on democracy of india.clearly india is now in wrong hands, congress party members has to answer for this.

MYTH-REALITY

MYTH: AP is totally divided in to two parts, one- telangana, two-seemandhra.

REALITY: People are not divided in to two parts or any number of parts claimed by politicians. people are united and do not feel politicians words as they felt politicians are doing everything for their sake but not for people.

MYTH: All telangana people are demanding t state.

REALITY: number of people in t region who are demanding t state in only 5-10%.in HYD none is asking t state.

MYTH: Telangana movement is 54 year old, samaikyandhra movement is a month old.

REALITY: Telangana movement never existed or existing now also. if Telangana movement existed then why it merged with Andhra state in 1956 and how it is possible if movement existed. Vishalandhra movement rose up in Telangana asking its merger with Andhra state. where is T movement in 1956 and from 1956-69, 1969-2001.why TRS could not contest all seats alone in 2004,9 elections, why TRS could not win in 2009 in seats it contested.

samaikyandhra movement existing from british days , its name may vary but intention/goal is same.

Committee! for what?

congress high command- not govt of india- formed committee for consultations. irrespective of its terms of reference what is the intention behind forming committee and report content getting from committee.committee is a tool to justify one's actions by siting committee findings/recommendations/advises as genuine ones.may be possible reasons behind forming committee

1. To buy time to defeat, eliminate separatism politically.- committee will submit report for united ap and sites reasons for it and submits in appropriate time that will help politically.

2. To justify division plans with reasons- committee will justify division and site reasons for it and submit report in needed time.

3. To declare Hyd is not part of Telangana even if T happens or T demand comes to surface in future- committee will recommend united state,recommend hyd is collective property and can not be part of T region if separation happens.- it will check separation demand in future as people, leaders can not claim on hyd even if they raise separation.now all movement is for hyd, if parties say hyd is not part of t region then they will lose, but if it comes from committee then every one will accept.

4. To solve regionalism problem permanently by getting suggestions from committee and making amendments to the constitution to defeat regionalism and associated politics with it by taking t issue as an example or starting point.

5. Solving all problems in state politically and solve go.610, free zone...problems and making all equal. and providing facts to the people on which separatists claiming separate state, thus defeating separatists on one hand and solving political, administrative problems on other hand by siting committee report.

6. buying time to solve separation, unionist problem politically and then smashing committee by siting no need of committee as problem is solved.

goals may be mixed

sri krishna committee has no planning commission member, no historian, no politician...to interpret things in genuine way and do right judgement. planning commission member knows importance of every project and the goal behind it and causes of each project/plan/policy in preparing , implementing in certain area.

ultimately committee serves congress high command interests whether it is separation agenda or unionist agenda, so chances could not be taken, thats why committee should be rejected.thus its validity and its recommendations will not be binding on unionists if it recommends separation, but if it recommends uninism then acceptance or reject does not matter.

one thing is certain and must for congress high command.it must put end to t issue well before 2014 elections. till 2009 there was no party with clear cut stand on united ap, people depended, trusted their leaders in parties, but t issue was sole agenda of trs and others, now situation changed, prp took clear cut stand on united ap, Rayalaseema party with clear cut stand on united AP may emerge, and present critical political situation forced people to ask or vote for only that party which exclusively guarantees united AP.. counter emerged to the trs in seemandhra region, hyd and united ap seeking constituencies in t region. as long as there was no party on clear stand on united ap issue parties-cong,tdp or others can play with t issue, but now they have no option as present situation proved to the people that they should not trust any leader and go for single point party. double speak will benefit prp,trs. single word policy must, but it can not be taken unless problem is solved, for tdp its second as it is not in power and has no authority to solve it, but for cong it is must.so congress has to solve it and that too keeping people, business...national interest in mind. tdp likes this as it has no responsibility except putting cong in problems , committee will not solve problem, committee will aid to solve problem, even if committee recommends 100% for t state or united ap that can not be welcome unless politics changes and favours single decision. it is the crux of this issue. can cong win politics? already it is running indirect/direct governor rule by putting security expert as governor so that it could end movement in t region with iron hand, once movement ends in nay form then political action starts.lets see

here point is separatists asking committee on separation issue only, they are saying separation is justifiable and siting various reasons for it, if these reasons are justifiable and carries validity to form separate state then why they fear about committee in holistic sense.this shows separation has no valid reasons.

selfish raskels, senseless people...nonsense movement

T agitation is started by selfish raskels in politics, employment, education,caste...- TRS, EMPLOYMENT BODIES HEADS, CASTE WING HEADS...-this movement is supported by senseless people by believing words of these selfish so called leaders, in fact these people dont know what they are doing in true sense. in reality by supporting these rakels they are destroying their future and moving backward, of course moving forward or backward is left to their wisdom, but they are influencing lives of seemandhra, hyd people also to move backward against their wish. as i discussed earlier in my past articles T movement results, resulting in loss to T people and they are experiencing it right from 2001 with Nov 09 acting as clear mark point. every industry in T region is suffering loses, real estate industry is closed in reality and in acute loses...but these fellows dont leave their slogan. students who are expected to be learnt are following taliban ideology. their slogans are" telanganakaddoste addamga narikestam" vadevvadu veedevvadu telanganakaddevvadu" pranalaina arpistam telangana sadhistam" pranalaina teesestam telangana saadhistam" " hyderabad evadabba sothu ra"...all vulgar, exiciting slogans making, provoking animocity between people, attacks and suicides...

this nonsense movement is for well being of t politicians but for destruction of people of t region, people of ap. these people, students forget YSR immediately after his death, they forget his fee reimbursement schemes for students, jala yagnam, araogya sri...and treating him as their enemy after benefitting all from him. traitors. they beleive every word said by their leaders and dont think, question, act on truth. because of this type of dogmatism which they are displaying now leaders of this region exploiting it for their gain, instead of revolting against selfish raskels they are backing these raskels.now these raskels are advocating militant movement, lets see what happens.

some people especially T leaders are saying leaders who are fighting for T state, maoist has no role in T movement, it is peoples movement. and leaders, maoists are quite contrary to each other and does not carry validity to the words of seemandhra/samaikyandhra leaders. but here fact is that both leaders n T region, maoists are oposite to each other, but both want separate T state for their interests, they have their own designs after T formation, leaders think after T formation they can crush maoists but they need maoists support for T formation, maoists think they need leaders support for T formation, after T formation they will become strong. both of them came together now for their interests in single cause, after it is achieved they start their work.

time has come for samaikyandhra leaders, activists to follow tough stance against these stupids, patience has limits and they have crossed it in 2001 itself, no more patience is preferabale now, use tough stance to defeat separatists, eliminate separatists.

strong leader should take leadership of samaikyandhra movement and run the show.

NO SEPARATISM

the strategy behind dec.9 statement of congress- not govt of india- which is popularly known as chidambara rahasyam is nothing but eliminating T issue completely in AP politics.some people say it is for dividing AP, but i feel it is not for dividing AP but to keep it united forever and check all parties in state, centre from using T issue and dividing congress votes in AP.

We all know that T issue is not priority issue in 2009 elections and T issue was never used in 2009 election in any form except by TRS. congress depended on development, YSR charishma. TDP depended on corruption, alternative to congress,political murders...PRP depended on social justice, minimum needs...

all parties did not give consent to T state demand on dec.7 meeting with CM. TDP,PRP gave in principle support but did not accepted t state, MIM, LOK SATTA did not say single word,CONGRESS left it to high command so that high command will discus with all leaders in state and decide on congress stand.rossaiah committee is in start of its business. so there is no validity and does not send any signal to centre on acceptance of t state.

congress knew well that seemandhra leaders of all parties, hyd leaders of all parties, majority leaders in rest of telangana will not accept t state, people of state are for united ap only and united state only will develop, division creates un ending problems resulting in backward movement of both and also knew its position if division happens.

every reason supports there is no validity in dec.9 statement but still it was made, why? is there is any conspiracy to divide state? or strategy to put permanent end to separatists in AP and save congress in AP,INDIA? i prefer second one. of course it could have done with other strategies, but due to counter games of parties in ap-tdp,trs,prp,lok satta... made congress game complex. we have to observe that this situation is complex itself in nature, and it was made more complex for desired results.

see now in future, committee will lose its significance, congress will eliminate separatists with in party by putting powerful leader as head of affairs in open or in covert.trs...militant elements will be defeated, unpopularised and suppressed, eliminated.by next elections no separatist voice, ap will move or decide firmly on united ap position.

people should know that both T movement, samaikyandhra movement were creations after KCR irked congress with his fake fast supported by students provoked by him, but whether KCR went for fast with or with out knowledge of congress is in question mark?,what ever may be TRS played counter game in first phase well, but after it lost everything,now it its fate is in question mark, BJP can not ask votes with T name.congress safe, TDP safe, PRP safe, but TRS is no more.

its only a prediction with reason

COMMITTEE ?

There is no need to accept committee on ap/t issues. accepting committee means accepting dispute, when there is no validity to dispute raised some nonsense persons then why committee should be accepted. problem should be solved with politics only.

congress high command, which takes decisions of central govt declared that it appointed a committee with sri krishna as chairman on ap issue/t issue. wording of home ministry is double edged knife, any one can interpret it in any way either in favour to them or opposite to them.

this committee has v.k.duggal- ex home secretary and two professors in the committee one is on social sciences, one is on constitutional law and other person is a senior research fellow on food security.

committee should be rejected with out any second thought who ever wishes united ap. in my past article i suggested committee formation as part of solution to the ap problem, but not a solution to the problem. the conditions to form committee is entirely different from present conditions.events, facts from dec.9 showed that congress high command especially mr. chidambaram has covert agenda to divide ap. i have discussed reasons why iam saying that congress is in favour of division in past articles.

committee is a safe route to get authentication to wishes of those who forms it. if wishes of committee formers are justifiable and represents true wishes of people but some obstacles are there to implement justifiable people wish then committee can be formed to get authentication on people wish. if wishes of committee formers are against people wish, has no justice and obstacles are there to implement their selfish wishes then also committee is safe route to get justification of their wishes. here committee will recommend what committee formers want. committee will be formed with members of those who favours committee formers decisions/wishes in direct/in direct way and finds reasons to justify their wishes.

committee has sharp edges on both sides. committee formers will decide what committee should report and how it should justify its stand and when committee has to submit its report.

terms of reference of committee are crucial and its out come will influence decision.

committee recommendations will decide fate of ap irrespective of govt in centre or state accepts its recommendations, because of complexity in ap issue. so committee recommendation is crucial and congress high command using this route to justify its decision on ap issue. but so far centre/congress high command did not represent true wishes of people of ap, all sections of ap except a few selfish leaders in t region.so congress high command has no trust in people of ap.

reasons why iam opposing committee

1. congress high command intention is 100% suapicious

2. committee need is not there in ap.

3. committee has no telugu person- political,edu- who knows telugu people mindset,culture...

4. committee has no right to decide fate of people of ap, india.

5. committee members mind set-negative/positive- should not dictate fate of people of ap,india

6. congress favoured committee route only to justify its decision on ap issues irrespective of opposition from any one with in ap,india and shut down all voices in rest of india.

7. committee may or may not give single verdict, it may give different views both far and against division thus it again creates problem.

8. no party, people in any region/district is binded by the decisions of committee, they oppose it if it is against their wishes.

9. on what basis seemandhra congress leaders say committee will recommend united state. it will be 50-50 only.

10. committee formation status, validity to the recommendations of committee are suspicious.

11. committee was formed after dividing people with dec.9 statement when separatists has no support in t region. centre assured people that t state will be formed against so far strong belief in people that ap can not be divided. centre made separatists strong, and did not arrest unlawful,undemocratic activities, approaches of separatists.

12. congress knew that congress leaders in seemandhra, hyd and many leaders in t region are against t state. tdp leaders are against t state. prp,cpm will not support separation. so where is support for separation. it knows that people of t region are against t state. so it gave dec.9 statement, it assured people that t state is formed and easily formed if they ask and strengthened separatists. now it formed committee for consultations. that means before forming committee it intentionally divided parties in state, assured t people that they will get t state if they ask. so committee is not acceptable.

13. committee members will be having their own ideology in dealing with every issue and their recommendations will represent their ideology only. if we ask an economist he/she looks with economist's view and replies in that view only, the same thing is viewed, interpreted by others. i.e. views of every one is different according to their ideology, but here needed thing is people unity, true development,national unity, solving regionalism, preventing problems in india,ap forever...for this purpose committee has no role. so far no committee solved any problem satisfactorily. any way ap is going to be in problems and no committee or govt or party can solve problem except congress,tdp. meeting of congress-tdp at high level will solve problem simply, but congress dont want to talk with naidu and proceed in its own way.if we analyse a situation by making it pieces then solution will be in pieces manner only, there will be no single solution or unique solution or all solutions will not be in complementarity to each other or support each other as it is represented by different persons.doctor's prescription for each ailment with each drug will not cure body's illness instead it creates more problems due to over dose, confused treatment, unwanted drugs, side effects of all drugs or single drug of those used, fatal influence of single or all drugs, and mainly identification of all ailments in right quantity. patient needs minimum or single drug to cure all ailments and assures healthy body with out side effects.committee never gives or can not give single solution.

committee is acceptable only if it is intended for united ap wish of congress high command and committee works according to it. but so far happenings proved congress high command is working against united ap and against people's wish. and committee is only a way to find reasons for justifying its covert agenda.

if congress high command is following top to bottom approach and it mixes it with political action then committee is welcome. but we can not trust congress party in both sides so oppose committee thus keep option with you to accept or reject committee recommendations when they are made and come to road again if they are against your wish.

committee serves only to buy time for political actions. as i said earlier only politic actions will solve t problem in state.

lets see what congress high command do. whether it appoints strong leader as cm in ap and allows him/her to do all political equations or continues with present old weak political fellow but acts itself strong from delhi. its actions will give signals on committee report.

of course centre can dissolve committee at any time when it feels there is no need for committee and problem is solved, problem solves politically only, so gavt can find time to do political equations, as true politics starts from now only so far only crisis management, check to check politics happened. on one side committee will do its work on other side politics will start work. once politics solves problem then there is no need for committee but committee can be continued with united ap verdict so that separatism will get permanent end. but centre intention, actions on ground are in question mark.

I prefers to reject committee irrespective of work it will do or help in decision making or justifying decision. committee is a route for congress to save it self in both regions of ap only. decision of committee is already made by the congress and wants its decision in the form of committee decision to justify its decision. division idea of ap is dangerous and leads to division of india in to pieces, there is no doubt in this. ap has all unity factors than india, if ap is divided itself then why not india. separation issue in ap has to be solved with politics,force but not with committee or elections. some people are saying ap is not under same rule in history, but ap is mostly ruled as single unit from satavahans to major extent, but india is never under same rule in its 5000 year old history even during british rule. so india is eligible to divide in to pieces.during british rule himalayan hill areas from makran coast to mizoram are not under british rule, french,portugal , dutch...ruled india.