Appoint a committee or commission of experts with supreme court judge as chairman. appoint historians, sociologists,anthropologists,planning commission members,politicians from both united ap -t voice, industry experts, security experts...to study ap problems in depth and take views of all stake holders in person- residents of hyd, t region,seemandhra,seemandhra residents in t region/hyd,muslims in hyd,muslims in t region,muslims in seemandhra,industry-all industries,farmer assosiations,universities....on their problems so far as ascribed by separatists.
collect all data from central state govts on investments in entire state and their intentions and benefits to all people, ascertain relative worth of development from 1956 by applying economy of india,ap and problems of india,ap and ground situation in 1956 in every district and present situation. take planning commission role as crucial part here. relative development of each district has to be compared with obstacles point of view also while assessing its development as obstacles play crucial role in determining the pace of development.
give mandate to the commission to recommend feasible solutions to development of all people of ap by keeping in mind best interests of people of ap in short,long term and protecting ,promoting unity and integrity of people of state, country and protecting, promoting interests of every stake holder in state in all aspects both present and in future.
fix a time frame of 5 years as time for submitting report.as it is a huge task. definitely it will run for atleast 20 years even if every one looked for it.
give directions to head of commission, and its members to recommend united ap solution as the only solution. it should be an agreement form between govt,commission head/members in covert.
appoint united ap favouring leaders from t region as commission's members, but before project them as strong t leaders in public,political circles by targeted campaign.
once peace comes in to state and commission starts its functioning then no one thinks about commission's report as t sentiment is nothing but nonsense and shallow , baseless argument for separate state. even if any one voices then show commission as solution provider.
politically win people support with strong leader running state.all development activities in all districts, elimination of anti social elements with firm hand and political suicides/eliminations will put separatist voice in ocean bottom.
in the mean while politics will cahnge in state as now they have experienced fate of taking separatist voice lightly and playing vote bank politics. now they start eliminating separatist voice getting strength. already PRP took united ap as its stand, other parties will definitely support united ap voice other wise they lose maximum votes from united ap supporters who are all over state.
people will realise there will be no separation forever due to complexity in ap issues. they dont support separatists thus these separatists becomes baseless. on other hand no one is supporting separation now itself . so there will be no one in future also. generation change will erode all selfish politics.increase in awareness of people will defeat every game of politicians.
i propose this approach if problem too much complex and tough, but now situation is simple, no movement is there in reality, no people support is there in genuine perspective,separatists are a few only but they are using central govt decision makers stupid thinking. there is no need to go for long approach. what needed is central govt should act with firm stand to defeat separatism, if it acts rightly then problem will be solved with in months/days. if it is stubborn and dont want risk follow long term path. short term approach which i said in fore article ensures end to political instability, thus assures people, industry, development activities immediately but it needs strong leader to implement it rightly and defeat opponents as opponents will put their best to create problems. on the other hand long term approach will elongate political instability and voice will raise or down depending on the ability of united ap leaders, separatist leaders and politics at centre.in the coalition politics separatists will get strength if leader is strong compared to united ap leader. now ap has weak leader compared to separatist leader.more over long term approach means leaving solution to next generations with out putting end to it permanently when opportunity came in. but if cm is strong then short or long term both work, so make cm strong and follow short approach, now cm is weak, so use power in his name by making him as symbolic, crush fake movement, eliminate problem then appoint strong person as cm to win those who pained due to crush policy, so all won,problem solved forever. whether aicc has guts to do?it is not headed by indira gandhi.
No comments:
Post a Comment